From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from vms040pub.verizon.net (vms040pub.verizon.net [206.46.252.40])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j3LBbES5008948
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 11:37:14 GMT
Received: from vmware.local.domain ([65.169.92.10])
 by vms040.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2 HotFix 0.04
 (built Dec 24 2004)) with ESMTPA id <0IFA001BSOA75O31@vms040.mailsrvcs.net> for
 gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 06:37:20 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by vmware.local.domain (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 219EB91A2E; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 06:37:18 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 06:37:17 -0500
From: Paul Varner <gentoo-dev@varnerfamily.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] New apache stuff in testing -> please	package.mask it
In-reply-to: <200504210548.29928@zippy.emcb.local>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Message-id: <1114083437.6170.3.camel@vmware.local.domain>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.4
Content-type: text/plain
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
References: <200504210548.29928@zippy.emcb.local>
X-Archives-Salt: 7974a67e-b131-45a6-ae18-d50ec7b0591d
X-Archives-Hash: 12c932c70fdb21298ceb64b3e5a6b249

On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 05:48 +0100, Elfyn McBratney wrote:
> I've filed a bug[1] requesting that ebuilds with updated apache stuff 
> (anything using the new apache-module or depend.apache eclass/the new install 
> layout) be package.mask'd due to the regressions and breakages in testing.  I 
> may have missed packages in the bug, hence this mail - you know best if your 
> using new stuff. :)
> 
> Please package.mask said ebuilds ASAP so we can get apache itself into 
> package.mask.

Even though I stated my opinion that I would like to see the new changes
package masked again, the consensus that I read on the thread disagreed
with that approach.

My unsolicited opinion based upon the previous thread is since it is
already out of the bag, leave it in ~arch and actively work the bugs so
that you can get it to the point of being able to mark it stable.

Regards,
Paul
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list