From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.rwisp.com (webmail.rwisp.com [208.191.32.9]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j3HJH9uv025164 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 17 Apr 2005 19:17:10 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.rwisp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37388EA2A1 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 17 Apr 2005 14:20:23 -0500 (CDT) Received: from mail.rwisp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 07306-03 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 17 Apr 2005 14:20:19 -0500 (CDT) Received: from 129-kids.homershut.net (linux.homershut.net [64.216.105.3]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.rwisp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42F2FEA2A6 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 17 Apr 2005 14:20:19 -0500 (CDT) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] net-irc/xchat-xsys: Test request for ~x86 & ~amd64 From: Homer Parker <hparker@gentoo.org> To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <1113737622.14452.7.camel@localhost> References: <1113737622.14452.7.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2005 14:17:13 -0500 Message-Id: <1113765433.5356.6.camel@localhost> Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.4 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at rwisp.com X-Archives-Salt: a9f78ddd-87d9-4deb-b52f-c483356f18ef X-Archives-Hash: 44554e66f5240414316feaedb20b6a5a On Sun, 2005-04-17 at 12:33 +0100, Tony Vroon wrote: > Could any xchat-xsys users that are not afraid of using an experimental > patch unmask version 1.9.3 with /etc/portage/package.unmask and see if > the /video output gives you the right information. > If I get 10 reports that it works, I'll unmask it and unleash it on ~x86 > and ~amd64. Works ok here.. cpu[1 x AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3200+ @ 798MHz w/ 1024 KB L2 Cache] os[hparker@laptop, Linux 2.6.11-gentoo-r3 x86_64] snd_card[0: ICH - SiS SI7012] uname[Linux laptop 2.6.11-gentoo-r3 #1 Sun Apr 3 21:39:47 CDT 2005 x86_64 AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3200+ AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux] vid_card[ATI Technologies Inc RV350 [Mobility Radeon 9600 M10] @ 1280x800x24bpp] -- Homer Parker Gentoo/AMD64 Arch Tester Operational Lead hparker@gentoo.org -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list