From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ppsw-5.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-5.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.135]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j3ELn8tr006789 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 21:49:08 GMT Received: from cpc1-cmbg1-5-0-cust4.cmbg.cable.ntl.com ([62.253.134.4]:45124 helo=[192.168.0.10]) by ppsw-5.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.155]:465) with esmtpsa (PLAIN:spb42) (SSLv3:RC4-MD5:128) id 1DMCCw-0000Y4-Il (Exim 4.44) for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org (return-path <spb@gentoo.org>); Thu, 14 Apr 2005 22:49:07 +0100 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Nested die error From: Stephen Bennett <spb@gentoo.org> To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <200504141642.22339.caleb@gentoo.org> References: <200504141642.22339.caleb@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 22:54:11 +0100 Message-Id: <1113515651.18201.2.camel@localhost> Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.4 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: spb42@hermes.cam.ac.uk X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/ X-Cam-AntiVirus: No virus found X-Cam-SpamDetails: Not scanned X-Archives-Salt: b81847db-20b3-4c1f-81e9-d9ced2f37baf X-Archives-Hash: 4d109fd55ec6847badb26b02eead4a56 On Thu, 2005-04-14 at 16:42 -0500, Caleb Tennis wrote: > So it seems repoman doesn't like nested die calls like this: > > use blah && ( emake foo || die ) > Yep, because that doesn't work. > What's the trick? Wrap the emake in a if/then call? Yes. > Ignore repoman at the > risk of potential finger breakage by mr_bones'? Well, you can as long as you don't mind your ebuild not working. :) -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list