From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ppsw-4.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-4.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.134]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j3DIqewN022439 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 18:52:40 GMT Received: from cpc1-cmbg1-5-0-cust4.cmbg.cable.ntl.com ([62.253.134.4]:39657 helo=[192.168.0.10]) by ppsw-4.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.154]:465) with esmtpsa (PLAIN:spb42) (SSLv3:RC4-MD5:128) id 1DLmyY-0007DE-FP (Exim 4.44) for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org (return-path <spb@gentoo.org>); Wed, 13 Apr 2005 19:52:34 +0100 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] USE_EXPAND additions From: Stephen Bennett <spb@gentoo.org> To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <200504132048.27042.jstubbs@gentoo.org> References: <200504132048.27042.jstubbs@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 19:57:37 +0100 Message-Id: <1113418657.11659.2.camel@localhost> Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.4 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: spb42@hermes.cam.ac.uk X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/ X-Cam-AntiVirus: No virus found X-Cam-SpamDetails: Not scanned X-Archives-Salt: 2f4ef7d7-9090-444f-a451-cfc004997907 X-Archives-Hash: 44844aedf99919a3267a9fa05971cf9b On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 20:48 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote: > Anyway, any objections against moving the current USE_EXPAND out of > make.globals and into base's make.defaults? Those using <=2.0.50* won't get > any additions (how it is now anyway) and anybody using a stacked profile > (which requires >=2.0.51) will get whatever is in make.globals overwritten > with whatever is in make.defaults. Sounds good to me. Waiting on new portage releases for stuff we want to use in ebuilds kinda sucks, so (up to a point) the more we can move into profiles the better, as far as I'm concerned. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list