From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j36LmetL016252 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 21:48:40 GMT Received: from ctb-mesg3.saix.net ([196.25.240.75]) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DJIO0-0005rn-7q for gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 21:48:32 +0000 Received: from gateway.lan (wblv-146-225-163.telkomadsl.co.za [165.146.225.163]) by ctb-mesg3.saix.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64D102102 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 23:48:37 +0200 (SAST) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gateway.lan (Postfix) with ESMTP id B37323A26DB for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 23:54:27 +0200 (SAST) Received: from gateway.lan ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (gateway.lan [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 15803-07 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 23:54:24 +0200 (SAST) Received: from nosferatu.lan (nosferatu.lan [192.168.0.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher IDEA-CBC-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gateway.lan (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B3FE3A26DA for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 23:54:24 +0200 (SAST) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] PAM related: pam_console ? From: Martin Schlemmer To: gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <200504010019.11949@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> References: <200503311517.10772@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> <200503312309.32217@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> <200503311635.08181.vapier@gentoo.org> <200504010019.11949@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-OClMIhyTwrgSTpXcxQp8" Organization: Gentoo Foundation Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 23:52:19 +0200 Message-Id: <1112824339.9136.107.camel@nosferatu.lan> Precedence: bulk List-Post: , , List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.1.1 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at nosferatu.za.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 04904318-bca6-4fed-a69f-5f4a10fa0e2d X-Archives-Hash: fd8821847c9f95376c4c2dd2f4178c05 --=-OClMIhyTwrgSTpXcxQp8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2005-04-01 at 00:19 +0200, Diego "Flameeyes" Petten=C3=B2 wrote: > On Thursday 31 March 2005 23:35, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > if you do split it though, i'd suggest you split every module rather th= an > > just certain ones that catch your fancy ... better to be consistent :p > That's what I wanted to do, provide only basic modules with linux-pam=20 > (pam_unix and other) needed for basic auth facilities. >=20 And every time there is a version update also update the slew of other ebuilds? Like I said, if I wanted to be in the KDE/gstreamer herds, I would have been. > pam_console was just the first of the list. >=20 You want it that bad, you can do it, but then you are its daddy, and do all the updating, bug fixing (I'm sure the devfs crap do will give issues, as its compile tested to 0.78 api) etc (and thank god if you do). > Anyway, pam 0.79 is out.. I just ask pam herd if they can add virtual/pam= so=20 > that we can continue on openpam :) >=20 Yes, I know will get to it somewhere - its usually a pita to get some patches updated (pam_console-* for example :/) ... I'll get to it eventually (want to first see what fedora do, as many pam guys are from redhat). --=20 Martin Schlemmer Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop/System Team Developer Cape Town, South Africa --=-OClMIhyTwrgSTpXcxQp8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCVFoTqburzKaJYLYRAgFJAJ42WwSLqlZUPuadieNzFOfc0kOI1ACffIfj Ftfap3tMAOY3JLydi5DCcjQ= =6tOW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-OClMIhyTwrgSTpXcxQp8-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list