From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j32GpNat015875 for ; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 16:51:24 GMT Received: from p66-135.acedsl.com ([66.114.66.135] helo=anyarch.net) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DHlqL-0004Xv-Mj for gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 16:51:29 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by anyarch.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9231D199CB5 for ; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 11:51:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from anyarch.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.anyarch.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 14611-03 for ; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 11:51:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from amd64.anyarch.net (unknown [192.168.25.108]) by anyarch.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11D95199C9A for ; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 11:51:29 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Identifying inherit-only / usable profiles (round 2) From: Daniel Ostrow To: gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <1112460095.604.0.camel@vertigo.twi-31o2.org> References: <42224847.1060703@gentoo.org> <200504011602.07257.vapier@gentoo.org> <424E388E.3030408@gentoo.org> <200504021635.58532.jstubbs@gentoo.org> <1112460095.604.0.camel@vertigo.twi-31o2.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-pRhmKhVcIyc32+plRAgc" Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2005 11:51:13 -0500 Message-Id: <1112460673.7137.1.camel@amd64.anyarch.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: , , List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at anyarch.net X-Archives-Salt: 78dae4bc-94b5-43b8-ae37-11e45aafc08d X-Archives-Hash: 766fc1f2b5613929cb3e46eb96d498c6 --=-pRhmKhVcIyc32+plRAgc Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 2005-04-02 at 11:41 -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > On Sat, 2005-04-02 at 16:35 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote: > > Seeing that I added that output, I guess I should reply. The reason for= it was=20 > > that only one profile per keyword will be checked at the moment. Essent= ially,=20 > > the output was both to make people aware of this fact and to make sure = people=20 > > know *which* profile is being checked. > >=20 > > I figure your going to tell me that all listed profiles should be check= ed and=20 > > I'd have to agree so, if it'll prevent the addition of another useless = file,=20 > > I guess I'll get right on it. >=20 > jstubbs++ >=20 > Give us a shout when you have something to test and I'll gladly fill up > profiles.desc with the valid profiles. >=20 jstubbs++ indeed I'm going to be making at least 2 dev profiles over the next week for ppc64, glad that will be able to be checked. jstubbs++ again. Let us know when you need testers. --Dan --=-pRhmKhVcIyc32+plRAgc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCTs2Asb0gXCN8LgURAswaAJ0Q3l6HiM0lzXyumpG894eNtrlt9ACffzSs DAOWPQ4TdDaUCnBfEJFpVyM= =kLfO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-pRhmKhVcIyc32+plRAgc-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list