[gentoo-dev] Adding alsa to default USE for x86

[gentoo-dev] Adding alsa to default USE for x86

[Chris Gianelloni]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 349 bytes --]

Now that we are using 2.6 as our default kernel for x86, I think that we
should add alsa to the default USE flags for the architecture.  This
probably holds true for any other arch that is now on 2.6 and supports
alsa.

Any objections?

-- 
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering - Strategic Lead/QA Manager
Games - Developer
Gentoo Linux

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Adding alsa to default USE for x86

[Jason Wever]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, Chris Gianelloni wrote:

> Now that we are using 2.6 as our default kernel for x86, I think that we
> should add alsa to the default USE flags for the architecture.  This
> probably holds true for any other arch that is now on 2.6 and supports
> alsa.

As 2.6 kernels on the SPARC platforms do not work as reliably as 2.4 yet, 
we will probably refrain from making alsa a default use flag for now.

Cheers,
- -- 
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Co-Team Lead
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCSWxjdKvgdVioq28RAnR6AJ9ADnqUhinutXlgleoT3L59RlRA1QCeJYGP
RGMw3LlM20xGeMH7szTNsBU=
=IkCY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Adding alsa to default USE for x86

[John Mylchreest]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 606 bytes --]

On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 08:44 -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> Now that we are using 2.6 as our default kernel for x86, I think that we
> should add alsa to the default USE flags for the architecture.  This
> probably holds true for any other arch that is now on 2.6 and supports
> alsa.
> 
> Any objections?

none here. :)

-- 
Role:            Gentoo Linux Kernel Lead
Gentoo Linux:    http://www.gentoo.org
Public Key:      gpg --recv-keys 9C745515     
Key fingerprint: A0AF F3C8 D699 A05A EC5C  24F7 95AA 241D 9C74 5515
Web:
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x9C745515

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Adding alsa to default USE for x86

[Chris Bainbridge]

On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 18:36:22 +0100, John Mylchreest <johnm@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 08:44 -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > Now that we are using 2.6 as our default kernel for x86, I think that we
> > should add alsa to the default USE flags for the architecture.  This
> > probably holds true for any other arch that is now on 2.6 and supports
> > alsa.
> >
> > Any objections?
> 
> none here. :)

On a similar note, will nptl be enabled in the default x86 USE flags?
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Adding alsa to default USE for x86

[Chris Gianelloni]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 247 bytes --]

On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 08:46 +0000, Chris Bainbridge wrote:
> On a similar note, will nptl be enabled in the default x86 USE flags?

No.

-- 
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering - Strategic Lead/QA Manager
Games - Developer
Gentoo Linux

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Adding alsa to default USE for x86

[Ivan Yosifov]

Why ?

On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 08:53 -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 08:46 +0000, Chris Bainbridge wrote:
> > On a similar note, will nptl be enabled in the default x86 USE flags?
> 
> No.
> 

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list