From: Carlos Silva <r3pek@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] /var/ftp VS /home/ftp
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 00:47:00 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1111366020.13165.2.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200503210130.44843@malte.stretz.eu.org>
On Mon, 2005-03-21 at 01:30 +0100, Malte S. Stretz wrote:
> On Monday 21 March 2005 01:02 CET Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 23:49:05 +0000 Gustavo Adolfo Silva Ribeiro
> >
> > Felisberto <humpback@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > | Right now ftpd builds create /home/ftp directory as this will be the
> > | home of the anonymous account home. One user opened a bug and he says
> > | that the proper place would be /var/ftp to go with /var/www . What do
> > | you guys think?
> >
> > System dependent. If ftp directories are machine-local, /var. If they're
> > shared across many machines, /home. If your sysadmin is a two dollar
> > redhat crack monkey, /srv.
>
> You mean a two dollar redhat crack monkey who read the FHS 2.3? ;~)
>
> Having a /srv around might feel funny in the first place, but it indeed
> makes sense if you got used to it. Pretty nice to find the important
> things to backup for example (when I'm low on backup space I don't want to
> save the users' pr0n).
>
> I think the discussion whether Gentoo wants to adopt /srv or not died away
> without a conclusion about half a year ago.
Well, it's a fact that the two big distros for servers (RHAS3 and SLES9)
use /srv. They both had to get that ideia from somewhere...
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-21 0:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-20 23:49 [gentoo-dev] /var/ftp VS /home/ftp Gustavo Adolfo Silva Ribeiro Felisberto
2005-03-21 0:00 ` Mike Frysinger
2005-03-21 0:42 ` Donnie Berkholz
2005-03-21 0:56 ` Mike Frysinger
2005-03-21 0:02 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-03-21 0:30 ` Malte S. Stretz
2005-03-21 0:43 ` Mike Frysinger
2005-03-21 0:47 ` Carlos Silva [this message]
2005-03-21 1:52 ` Stuart Longland
2005-03-21 11:53 ` Carlos Silva
2005-03-21 12:16 ` Martin Schlemmer
2005-03-21 21:58 ` Drake Wyrm
2005-03-21 21:58 ` Drake Wyrm
2005-03-21 22:19 ` Carlos Silva
2005-03-22 1:27 ` Mike Frysinger
2005-03-22 7:43 ` Sven Vermeulen
2005-03-22 12:18 ` Carlos Silva
2005-03-22 12:25 ` Paul Waring
2005-03-22 15:36 ` Alec Warner
2005-03-22 14:22 ` Mike Frysinger
2005-03-23 1:01 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-03-23 1:06 ` Mike Frysinger
2005-03-23 1:28 ` Wolfram Schlich
2005-03-23 1:22 ` Anthony Gorecki
2005-03-23 1:33 ` Mike Frysinger
2005-03-21 22:22 ` Juergen Hoetzel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1111366020.13165.2.camel@localhost \
--to=r3pek@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox