public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Carlos Silva <r3pek@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] /var/ftp VS /home/ftp
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 00:47:00 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1111366020.13165.2.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200503210130.44843@malte.stretz.eu.org>

On Mon, 2005-03-21 at 01:30 +0100, Malte S. Stretz wrote:
> On Monday 21 March 2005 01:02 CET Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 23:49:05 +0000 Gustavo Adolfo Silva Ribeiro
> >
> > Felisberto <humpback@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > | Right now ftpd builds create /home/ftp directory as this will be the
> > | home of the anonymous account home. One user opened a bug and he says
> > | that the proper place would be /var/ftp to go with /var/www . What do
> > | you guys think?
> >
> > System dependent. If ftp directories are machine-local, /var. If they're
> > shared across many machines, /home. If your sysadmin is a two dollar
> > redhat crack monkey, /srv.
> 
> You mean a two dollar redhat crack monkey who read the FHS 2.3? ;~)
> 
> Having a /srv around might feel funny in the first place, but it indeed 
> makes sense if you got used to it.  Pretty nice to find the important 
> things to backup for example (when I'm low on backup space I don't want to 
> save the users' pr0n).
> 
> I think the discussion whether Gentoo wants to adopt /srv or not died away 
> without a conclusion about half a year ago.

Well, it's a fact that the two big distros for servers (RHAS3 and SLES9)
use /srv. They both had to get that ideia from somewhere...

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list


  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-03-21  0:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-03-20 23:49 [gentoo-dev] /var/ftp VS /home/ftp Gustavo Adolfo Silva Ribeiro Felisberto
2005-03-21  0:00 ` Mike Frysinger
2005-03-21  0:42   ` Donnie Berkholz
2005-03-21  0:56     ` Mike Frysinger
2005-03-21  0:02 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-03-21  0:30   ` Malte S. Stretz
2005-03-21  0:43     ` Mike Frysinger
2005-03-21  0:47     ` Carlos Silva [this message]
2005-03-21  1:52       ` Stuart Longland
2005-03-21 11:53         ` Carlos Silva
2005-03-21 12:16           ` Martin Schlemmer
2005-03-21 21:58             ` Drake Wyrm
2005-03-21 21:58               ` Drake Wyrm
2005-03-21 22:19               ` Carlos Silva
2005-03-22  1:27                 ` Mike Frysinger
2005-03-22  7:43                   ` Sven Vermeulen
2005-03-22 12:18                     ` Carlos Silva
2005-03-22 12:25                     ` Paul Waring
2005-03-22 15:36                       ` Alec Warner
2005-03-22 14:22                     ` Mike Frysinger
2005-03-23  1:01                       ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-03-23  1:06                         ` Mike Frysinger
2005-03-23  1:28                           ` Wolfram Schlich
2005-03-23  1:22                         ` Anthony Gorecki
2005-03-23  1:33                           ` Mike Frysinger
2005-03-21 22:22       ` Juergen Hoetzel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1111366020.13165.2.camel@localhost \
    --to=r3pek@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox