From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j2DNwwri002573 for ; Sun, 13 Mar 2005 23:58:58 GMT Received: from [12.40.38.248] (helo=pursuit) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1DAcz4-0002rw-5L for gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org; Sun, 13 Mar 2005 23:58:58 +0000 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP concerning ebuild-development From: Lance Albertson To: gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <1110751682.9011.3.camel@nosferatu.lan> References: <200503131949.41001.adrian.lambeck@basicsedv.de> <200503132127.03938.danarmak@gentoo.org> <20050313210509.GA8524@kfk4ever.com> <20050313211707.0f396460@snowdrop> <1110749501.1903.23.camel@pursuit> <1110751682.9011.3.camel@nosferatu.lan> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-SCpPq3yNMCEvFCrRqEwJ" Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 17:58:58 -0600 Message-Id: <1110758338.9795.6.camel@pursuit> Precedence: bulk List-Post: , , List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 X-Archives-Salt: 80d05c3c-1144-4927-90c3-35c4d8a39517 X-Archives-Hash: b612241d2e2ef1ee51a01bb3f8d48898 --=-SCpPq3yNMCEvFCrRqEwJ Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2005-03-14 at 00:08 +0200, Martin Schlemmer wrote: > On Sun, 2005-03-13 at 15:31 -0600, Lance Albertson wrote: > > On Sun, 2005-03-13 at 21:17 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > > On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 22:05:09 +0100 Maurice van der Pot > > > wrote: > > > | For instance, checking (for all arches, for all use flag combos) if > > > | the dependencies are as stable or more stable (x86 > ~x86 > hard > > > | masked) than the thing depending on it. > > >=20 > > > Hasn't repoman been doing this correctly for a year or more now? I kn= ow > > > it wasn't the case when I joined, but bug 24160 is long fixed... > >=20 > > What if we had a service that did this check plus other stuff repoman > > doesn't count and report it to some web site that developers can look a= t > > daily to see QA bugs? Maybe run it daily or every 6-12 hours? I think > > someone mentioned something like that once. > >=20 >=20 > I think it would be worth a lot more if it was mailed to the maintainer > of the ebuild (and perhaps QA?), as it takes time and effort to wade > through a list (like the been in ~ for x days list that we used to get). How about both options? Some people prefer getting email reports, others prefer just going to a website. I don't see how this could be a problem, so why not offer both? :) Perhaps we should ask the author to rewrite his proposed GLEP to be more of a QA monitoring system that devs could use. Just my random thoughts... --=20 Lance Albertson Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager --- GPG Public Key: Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A 1282 5AB1 4D07 416F A15D 27F4 B742 ramereth/irc.freenode.net --=-SCpPq3yNMCEvFCrRqEwJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCNNPCQW+hXSf0t0IRAkUuAKDxh1ft28Bbr6eHDhmYjUHvE71FugCeMTJB NtP8mlH1TYvmWAPAmhE9oEI= =WkgQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-SCpPq3yNMCEvFCrRqEwJ-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list