On Mon, 2005-03-14 at 00:08 +0200, Martin Schlemmer wrote: > On Sun, 2005-03-13 at 15:31 -0600, Lance Albertson wrote: > > On Sun, 2005-03-13 at 21:17 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > > On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 22:05:09 +0100 Maurice van der Pot > > > wrote: > > > | For instance, checking (for all arches, for all use flag combos) if > > > | the dependencies are as stable or more stable (x86 > ~x86 > hard > > > | masked) than the thing depending on it. > > > > > > Hasn't repoman been doing this correctly for a year or more now? I know > > > it wasn't the case when I joined, but bug 24160 is long fixed... > > > > What if we had a service that did this check plus other stuff repoman > > doesn't count and report it to some web site that developers can look at > > daily to see QA bugs? Maybe run it daily or every 6-12 hours? I think > > someone mentioned something like that once. > > > > I think it would be worth a lot more if it was mailed to the maintainer > of the ebuild (and perhaps QA?), as it takes time and effort to wade > through a list (like the been in ~ for x days list that we used to get). How about both options? Some people prefer getting email reports, others prefer just going to a website. I don't see how this could be a problem, so why not offer both? :) Perhaps we should ask the author to rewrite his proposed GLEP to be more of a QA monitoring system that devs could use. Just my random thoughts... -- Lance Albertson Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager --- GPG Public Key: Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A 1282 5AB1 4D07 416F A15D 27F4 B742 ramereth/irc.freenode.net