From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j2DM50ve023538 for ; Sun, 13 Mar 2005 22:05:03 GMT Received: from ctb-mesg1.saix.net ([196.25.240.73]) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DAbCm-0004xm-3P for gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org; Sun, 13 Mar 2005 22:05:00 +0000 Received: from gateway.lan (wblv-146-195-166.telkomadsl.co.za [165.146.195.166]) by ctb-mesg1.saix.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC57261BA for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2005 00:04:58 +0200 (SAST) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gateway.lan (Postfix) with ESMTP id D76FD3A26DB for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2005 00:10:02 +0200 (SAST) Received: from gateway.lan ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (gateway.lan [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30418-05 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2005 00:09:57 +0200 (SAST) Received: from nosferatu.lan (nosferatu.lan [192.168.0.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher IDEA-CBC-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gateway.lan (Postfix) with ESMTP id 000CF3A26DA for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2005 00:09:56 +0200 (SAST) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP concerning ebuild-development From: Martin Schlemmer To: gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <1110749501.1903.23.camel@pursuit> References: <200503131949.41001.adrian.lambeck@basicsedv.de> <200503132127.03938.danarmak@gentoo.org> <20050313210509.GA8524@kfk4ever.com> <20050313211707.0f396460@snowdrop> <1110749501.1903.23.camel@pursuit> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-BfZMlNhEbfnmqGYKR1nO" Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 00:08:02 +0200 Message-Id: <1110751682.9011.3.camel@nosferatu.lan> Precedence: bulk List-Post: , , List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.0 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at nosferatu.za.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 93382757-c06d-4c48-b3d4-f14931bd9c72 X-Archives-Hash: a80d2e1e31e658f8af71189992571b1b --=-BfZMlNhEbfnmqGYKR1nO Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 2005-03-13 at 15:31 -0600, Lance Albertson wrote: > On Sun, 2005-03-13 at 21:17 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 22:05:09 +0100 Maurice van der Pot > > wrote: > > | For instance, checking (for all arches, for all use flag combos) if > > | the dependencies are as stable or more stable (x86 > ~x86 > hard > > | masked) than the thing depending on it. > >=20 > > Hasn't repoman been doing this correctly for a year or more now? I know > > it wasn't the case when I joined, but bug 24160 is long fixed... >=20 > What if we had a service that did this check plus other stuff repoman > doesn't count and report it to some web site that developers can look at > daily to see QA bugs? Maybe run it daily or every 6-12 hours? I think > someone mentioned something like that once. >=20 I think it would be worth a lot more if it was mailed to the maintainer of the ebuild (and perhaps QA?), as it takes time and effort to wade through a list (like the been in ~ for x days list that we used to get). --=20 Martin Schlemmer Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop/System Team Developer Cape Town, South Africa --=-BfZMlNhEbfnmqGYKR1nO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCNLnCqburzKaJYLYRAhlMAKCTAE7nq0D4/fdxvlhhD2EerSAudgCdG2He 6A6B26+zg5KW4yVx8yWAZ/M= =a+UV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-BfZMlNhEbfnmqGYKR1nO-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list