On Sun, 2005-03-13 at 15:31 -0600, Lance Albertson wrote: > On Sun, 2005-03-13 at 21:17 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 22:05:09 +0100 Maurice van der Pot > > wrote: > > | For instance, checking (for all arches, for all use flag combos) if > > | the dependencies are as stable or more stable (x86 > ~x86 > hard > > | masked) than the thing depending on it. > > > > Hasn't repoman been doing this correctly for a year or more now? I know > > it wasn't the case when I joined, but bug 24160 is long fixed... > > What if we had a service that did this check plus other stuff repoman > doesn't count and report it to some web site that developers can look at > daily to see QA bugs? Maybe run it daily or every 6-12 hours? I think > someone mentioned something like that once. > I think it would be worth a lot more if it was mailed to the maintainer of the ebuild (and perhaps QA?), as it takes time and effort to wade through a list (like the been in ~ for x days list that we used to get). -- Martin Schlemmer Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop/System Team Developer Cape Town, South Africa