Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP concerning ebuild-development

[Martin Schlemmer <azarah@gentoo.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1168 bytes --]

On Sun, 2005-03-13 at 15:31 -0600, Lance Albertson wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-03-13 at 21:17 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 22:05:09 +0100 Maurice van der Pot
> > <griffon26@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > | For instance, checking (for all arches, for all use flag combos) if
> > | the dependencies are as stable or more stable (x86 > ~x86 > hard
> > | masked) than  the thing depending on it.
> > 
> > Hasn't repoman been doing this correctly for a year or more now? I know
> > it wasn't the case when I joined, but bug 24160 is long fixed...
> 
> What if we had a service that did this check plus other stuff repoman
> doesn't count and report it to some web site that developers can look at
> daily to see QA bugs? Maybe run it daily or every 6-12 hours? I think
> someone mentioned something like that once.
> 

I think it would be worth a lot more if it was mailed to the maintainer
of the ebuild (and perhaps QA?), as it takes time and effort to wade
through a list (like the been in ~ for x days list that we used to get).


-- 
Martin Schlemmer
Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop/System Team Developer
Cape Town, South Africa


[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]