From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j2DJF9YS006628 for ; Sun, 13 Mar 2005 19:15:09 GMT Received: from ctb-mesg2.saix.net ([196.25.240.74]) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DAYYN-0007tv-Pc for gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org; Sun, 13 Mar 2005 19:15:08 +0000 Received: from gateway.lan (wblv-146-195-166.telkomadsl.co.za [165.146.195.166]) by ctb-mesg2.saix.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34414385A for ; Sun, 13 Mar 2005 21:15:06 +0200 (SAST) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gateway.lan (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF75E3A26DB for ; Sun, 13 Mar 2005 21:20:09 +0200 (SAST) Received: from gateway.lan ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (gateway.lan [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 14474-17 for ; Sun, 13 Mar 2005 21:20:03 +0200 (SAST) Received: from nosferatu.lan (nosferatu.lan [192.168.0.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher IDEA-CBC-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gateway.lan (Postfix) with ESMTP id D96D53A26DA for ; Sun, 13 Mar 2005 21:20:03 +0200 (SAST) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP concerning ebuild-development From: Martin Schlemmer To: gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20050313190026.692fa5ce@snowdrop> References: <200503131949.41001.adrian.lambeck@basicsedv.de> <20050313190026.692fa5ce@snowdrop> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-0Drok2d6f2tHMTjnxKLt" Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 21:18:09 +0200 Message-Id: <1110741489.24307.17.camel@nosferatu.lan> Precedence: bulk List-Post: , , List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.0 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at nosferatu.za.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 0ea9bd67-ad54-437e-801d-ff191f504589 X-Archives-Hash: 964ed5ebf7df7a59749c2103a7a99fc3 --=-0Drok2d6f2tHMTjnxKLt Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 2005-03-13 at 19:00 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 19:49:40 +0100 Adrian Lambeck > wrote: > | Please have a look at it and tell me what you think: > | http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0035.html >=20 > Any automatic machine-done changes to ebuilds will break the tree far > more than the occasional developer screwup. To my shame I must concur with Ciaran ;p Maybe sending reports QA's way, or such would be more preferred, as you can never be 100% sure that your checking/fixing state machine is 100% correct - meaning I do think that an human eye (which at least can contact the responsible parties) should still be the last defence in *actually changing* ebuilds. --=20 Martin Schlemmer Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop/System Team Developer Cape Town, South Africa --=-0Drok2d6f2tHMTjnxKLt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCNJHwqburzKaJYLYRAte0AJ4xnE2tVw30AQsHZ5+Y3pWYBidB4gCfXs01 MZ7/Yz4MDSRb1XDepwGM42A= =lkBp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-0Drok2d6f2tHMTjnxKLt-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list