From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j2BLpWkr027693 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 21:51:33 GMT Received: from ctb-mesg1.saix.net ([196.25.240.73]) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D9s2c-00053a-Th for gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 21:51:31 +0000 Received: from gateway.lan (wblv-146-195-166.telkomadsl.co.za [165.146.195.166]) by ctb-mesg1.saix.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 602E458CE for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 23:51:28 +0200 (SAST) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gateway.lan (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDEBE3A26DA for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 23:56:28 +0200 (SAST) Received: from gateway.lan ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (gateway.lan [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 25911-15 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 23:56:24 +0200 (SAST) Received: from nosferatu.lan (nosferatu.lan [192.168.0.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher IDEA-CBC-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gateway.lan (Postfix) with ESMTP id E59B13A26DB for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 23:56:23 +0200 (SAST) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP system worthwhile? From: Martin Schlemmer To: gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20050311213356.7c32ad21@snowdrop> References: <20050311143951.GA27199@dst.grantgoodyear.org> <4231BE29.2020408@gentoo.org> <20050311192526.GB30649@dst.grantgoodyear.org> <42320696.7030404@gentoo.org> <1110576673.8513.3.camel@nosferatu.lan> <20050311213356.7c32ad21@snowdrop> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-9ZrBjajIL92+L5MY48a7" Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 23:54:30 +0200 Message-Id: <1110578070.8513.6.camel@nosferatu.lan> Precedence: bulk List-Post: , , List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.0 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at nosferatu.za.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 18343602-86e4-4479-8456-7c6008d6945c X-Archives-Hash: cdbbfa2aa1656c07883410892f4f5224 --=-9ZrBjajIL92+L5MY48a7 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2005-03-11 at 21:33 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 23:31:13 +0200 Martin Schlemmer > wrote: > | Given, but there should be a cutoff point I think ... 3-5 tries is OK, > | but 20 .... >=20 > And if 3-5 tries is enough to get all but a few small details figured > out? GLEP 29 might take a few more revisions just to get the one small > remaining issue ironed out... There's no objection to most of it, just > that the perfect solution hasn't been found for one small part of it > yet. >=20 > Now, if it goes past the 3-5 limit with lots of people still hating the > entire thing, that's an entirely different issue. >=20 I was more talking about the re-voting thing only - not posting to -dev and then revising after some comments. --=20 Martin Schlemmer Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop/System Team Developer Cape Town, South Africa --=-9ZrBjajIL92+L5MY48a7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCMhOWqburzKaJYLYRAjCNAJ9w+41yXfLB1o94VKCTVb1klnGaIACcCbsS shFoNUAV/Zo4S0BjeoHgIQU= =ClWV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-9ZrBjajIL92+L5MY48a7-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list