From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j2BLRATf002623 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 21:27:11 GMT Received: from ctb-mesg3.saix.net ([196.25.240.75]) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D9rf4-0007dP-5n for gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 21:27:10 +0000 Received: from gateway.lan (wblv-146-195-166.telkomadsl.co.za [165.146.195.166]) by ctb-mesg3.saix.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEF83253E for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 23:27:08 +0200 (SAST) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gateway.lan (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA1AE3A26DC for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 23:32:07 +0200 (SAST) Received: from gateway.lan ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (gateway.lan [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 25911-10 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 23:32:03 +0200 (SAST) Received: from nosferatu.lan (nosferatu.lan [192.168.0.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher IDEA-CBC-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gateway.lan (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0724A3A26DA for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 23:32:03 +0200 (SAST) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP system worthwhile? From: Martin Schlemmer To: gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <42320722.3000104@gentoo.org> References: <20050311143951.GA27199@dst.grantgoodyear.org> <4231BE29.2020408@gentoo.org> <20050311155822.3c0e1ddf@snowdrop> <4231C2D5.7000705@gentoo.org> <1110560759.21812.113.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> <4231D807.6030805@gentoo.org> <20050311182459.7eef58ae@snowdrop> <4231FF5F.5070407@gentoo.org> <20050311203049.4617e101@snowdrop> <42320722.3000104@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-3FDyEv7cET9WTSRUsDBu" Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 23:30:06 +0200 Message-Id: <1110576607.8513.1.camel@nosferatu.lan> Precedence: bulk List-Post: , , List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.0 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at nosferatu.za.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 54feea70-29f6-4567-ac91-dc91c8df26de X-Archives-Hash: 1896ddf50581853d6dcb9b6596fe49ca --=-3FDyEv7cET9WTSRUsDBu Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2005-03-11 at 21:01 +0000, Ian Leitch wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 >=20 > Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > | Developers don't do the voting. >=20 > I thought we were supposed to be an open organisation...*sigh* >=20 Right, but haven't you followed the stuff about voting in the other sekret mailing list, or in the meeting on Monday ? Wont give all devs votes, but should hopefully make coverage better. --=20 Martin Schlemmer Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop/System Team Developer Cape Town, South Africa --=-3FDyEv7cET9WTSRUsDBu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCMg3eqburzKaJYLYRAonRAJwPFCuepmRysNTmCoAUqYC+Uem17gCeP6FY 11eGWyiLUBwTXUwrZVhCbVk= =U90o -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-3FDyEv7cET9WTSRUsDBu-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list