On Fri, 2005-03-11 at 17:40 +0000, Ian Leitch wrote:
> Yes, but:
> 
> 1) The revision has to go through one of 2 GLEP editors, what's wrong
> with letting a dev do this themselves. I agree with genone on letting
> devs have CVS access. Pkus it's not obvious on the GLEP main page which
> GLEPs have been updated and require votes.

I could agree with this only if there were something in place that keeps
a new GLEP from being posted until it meets the proper layout.  I don't
want to see completely worthless entries that are still a work in
progress.  I would like it to at least be somewhat complete before I
spend time looking through them.

I'm thinking something like a barrier to entry, but not for editing.
Give the GLEP authors and a group of people accepted by the author
access to edit the GLEP.

> 2) Voting is done on -dev, I can't think of a worse place to conduct a
> vote. We need a web interface to count and clearly display votes for
> each revision.

I agree with you here.  Voting over a mailing list just isn't very
efficient.  Perhaps a login-restricted web page?  How about an app on
toucan?  "vote glep19 yes" or something equally as insane...

-- 
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering - Strategic Lead/QA Manager
Games - Developer
Gentoo Linux