From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j2BH1ruk004338 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 17:01:53 GMT Received: from smtp.nuvox.net ([64.89.70.9] helo=smtp04.gnvlscdb.sys.nuvox.net) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D9nWJ-0007iO-P4 for gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 17:01:51 +0000 Received: from cgianelloni.nuvox.net (216.215.202.4.nw.nuvox.net [216.215.202.4]) by smtp04.gnvlscdb.sys.nuvox.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with SMTP id j2BH1ktM014632 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 12:01:46 -0500 Received: by cgianelloni.nuvox.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 11 Mar 2005 12:06:00 -0500 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP system worthwhile? From: Chris Gianelloni To: gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <4231C2D5.7000705@gentoo.org> References: <20050311143951.GA27199@dst.grantgoodyear.org> <4231BE29.2020408@gentoo.org> <20050311155822.3c0e1ddf@snowdrop> <4231C2D5.7000705@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-AN7Mb4oiKI70SDEAEqlL" Organization: Gentoo Linux Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 12:05:59 -0500 Message-Id: <1110560759.21812.113.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: , , List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.4 X-Archives-Salt: 076c9c41-36b1-438c-a920-6f7794288510 X-Archives-Hash: 0adcb6d7b52bea2360668a52111d59d0 --=-AN7Mb4oiKI70SDEAEqlL Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2005-03-11 at 16:09 +0000, Ian Leitch wrote: > | 'Any' state is asking for trouble. You can post non-finished GLEP plans > | to the list in any state, but I'd expect things making it onto the site > | to be at least in reasonable draft state. >=20 > OK, that's fair enough, but just so long as the author can post a > revised version and have devs vote on it again. The main reason for this > is that it's hard to track changes made to a GLEP in a massive long -dev > thread. You just described the current process. A GLEP can be modified and have the revision voted on as it stands. --=20 Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead/QA Manager Games - Developer Gentoo Linux --=-AN7Mb4oiKI70SDEAEqlL Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCMc/3kT4lNIS36YERAsq9AKCoZ6tKwFEOUdfR3ROwq36m2cpcbQCfehBW fL408+1SO1VLv1RfsqDG1co= =xX5n -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-AN7Mb4oiKI70SDEAEqlL-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list