From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j2BAn1Gu001393 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 10:49:01 GMT Received: from dialup-4.225.25.222.dial1.cincinnati1.level3.net ([4.225.25.222] helo=rhett3.cowsncomputers.com) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D9hhT-0005te-EP for gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 10:49:00 +0000 Subject: Re: [OT Reply] Re: [gentoo-dev] win32codecs and avi global use flag split being intiated From: Brad Cowan To: gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <87br9qpm7d.fsf@home.gmurray.org.uk> References: <42313C45.7080009@gentoo.org> <4231464B.8070203@ramshacklestudios.com> <20050311072434.GA6358@curie-int.orbis-terrarum.net> <200503110752.03906.luke-jr@utopios.org> <87br9qpm7d.fsf@home.gmurray.org.uk> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-ODhYkjkZSYjmymOm9oMj" Organization: http://www.gentoo.org Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 05:48:58 -0500 Message-Id: <1110538138.21558.12.camel@rhett3.cowsncomputers.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: , , List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.4 X-Archives-Salt: 0d7d67ab-f278-48c5-97ed-2cba6c70f13e X-Archives-Hash: 84cd4f3537e59a226aaff399b9d4758b --=-ODhYkjkZSYjmymOm9oMj Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2005-03-11 at 09:26 +0000, Graham Murray wrote: > Luke-Jr writes: >=20 > > Actually, both ChrisWhite's and your signatures show up as bad under KM= ail=20 > > CVS... I think this is usually caused by a newline being added/removed=20 > > between signing and sending, but I'm not sure where the bug is since CW= and=20 > > Peter use EnigMail, you use Mutt, and I use KMail... not really any com= mon=20 > > program to fit to the symptoms. >=20 > And they both show as bad here using gnus-cvs. Weird only Robin's shows bad here, fingerprint from sig isn't matching the key it's trying to retrieve. Chris's shows up fine. --=20 Brad Cowan Developer, Gentoo Linux http://www.gentoo.org/~bcowan Public Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=3Dget&search=3D0xB1F16A5= 6 Key fingerprint =3D C408 75B9 E68D 26E2 EAAE 20CF 4D5E 293D B1F1 6A56 --=-ODhYkjkZSYjmymOm9oMj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCMXeaTV4pPbHxalYRAtAPAKCUH/EpmqzcPGSzPNjp2TE4mwpDPACgj/PL I1+c3nNgcunI+S4c8BQYWvg= =txF3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-ODhYkjkZSYjmymOm9oMj-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list