From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j2AFmcUN008515 for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 15:48:38 GMT Received: from smtp.nuvox.net ([64.89.70.9] helo=smtp03.gnvlscdb.sys.nuvox.net) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D9Ptt-0004CI-Nu for gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 15:48:37 +0000 Received: from cgianelloni.nuvox.net (216.215.202.4.nw.nuvox.net [216.215.202.4]) by smtp03.gnvlscdb.sys.nuvox.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with SMTP id j2AFmbBY020210 for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 10:48:38 -0500 Received: by cgianelloni.nuvox.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 10 Mar 2005 10:52:53 -0500 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Please follow keywording policy From: Chris Gianelloni To: gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <422FFD50.7020904@gentoo.org> References: <20050308185536.58ecbe3c@enterprise.weeve.org> <422EA7E2.4040206@gentoo.org> <422EFCA6.2010607@gentoo.org> <422F0D2E.1040301@gentoo.org> <20050309162258.624316be@snowdrop> <422F3482.8020607@gentoo.org> <20050309183846.426af19a@snowdrop> <422F46F3.4030208@gentoo.org> <422F7F4B.4090406@gentoo.org> <20050309234242.GB15846@time.flatmonk.org> <422FFD50.7020904@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-M/SYbhmZ3KSTA01JB1IU" Organization: Gentoo Linux Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 10:52:52 -0500 Message-Id: <1110469972.21812.13.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: , , List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.4 X-Archives-Salt: d02279a8-168a-4fc3-8c89-565b04644247 X-Archives-Hash: 0dabc328d03224e25b98e4ac5fc90af3 --=-M/SYbhmZ3KSTA01JB1IU Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 09:54 +0200, Alin Nastac wrote: > Again, I want to emphasize that I didn't break anything in portage tree,=20 > even if I have a "shoddy" attitude regarding Gentoo's QA. Nobody has said that you did. The complaint is that you're making an entire team out to be bad guys because they didn't use your same methods of "shoddy" QA. If I were on an arch team, I wouldn't mark something I couldn't possibly verify as working *at all* as stable, either. --=20 Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead/QA Manager Games - Developer Gentoo Linux --=-M/SYbhmZ3KSTA01JB1IU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCMG1UkT4lNIS36YERAgcXAKCbrLP4PvQMZNGan4L4W77f/CcMUQCgq/U1 Thgh8az1Z6ekHRLAWdmAxZM= =S7Py -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-M/SYbhmZ3KSTA01JB1IU-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list