From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j2ACWOWg005249 for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 12:32:25 GMT Received: from ctb-mesg4.saix.net ([196.25.240.76]) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D9Mpz-0007or-6r for gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 12:32:23 +0000 Received: from gateway.lan (wblv-146-195-166.telkomadsl.co.za [165.146.195.166]) by ctb-mesg4.saix.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47BA9B729 for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 14:32:18 +0200 (SAST) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gateway.lan (Postfix) with ESMTP id C469B3A26DB for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 14:37:15 +0200 (SAST) Received: from gateway.lan ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (gateway.lan [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 06930-14 for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 14:37:10 +0200 (SAST) Received: from nosferatu.lan (nosferatu.lan [192.168.0.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher IDEA-CBC-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gateway.lan (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA1BC3A26DA for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 14:37:09 +0200 (SAST) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [g2boojum@gentoo.org: glep 27 thoughts] From: Martin Schlemmer To: gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <200503091952.05483.vapier@gentoo.org> References: <20050308160153.GA1892@server.grantgoodyear.org> <200503081657.00270.vapier@gentoo.org> <1110366546.8842.154.camel@nosferatu.lan> <200503091952.05483.vapier@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-7wgpK6lxLaH4qAW4TKEl" Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 14:35:14 +0200 Message-Id: <1110458114.10048.2.camel@nosferatu.lan> Precedence: bulk List-Post: , , List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.0 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at nosferatu.za.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 9bff0e2d-74be-4ecc-8f2b-e4c53b2e9fc0 X-Archives-Hash: cec8b7b789545e14358c711f6c668c6b --=-7wgpK6lxLaH4qAW4TKEl Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 19:52 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Wednesday 09 March 2005 06:09 am, Martin Schlemmer wrote: > > On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 16:57 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > On Tuesday 08 March 2005 04:21 pm, Martin Schlemmer wrote: > > > > What about the libconf project ? Can't we still put that to use > > > > somehow (sorry, don't know the details anymore of it) to solve this > > > > issue? > > > > > > what do you mean 'still' ? when have we ever used it ? > > > > Never, but it was planned, thus the 'still' >=20 > ive never heard of such a plan :) >=20 > besides, libconf sounds like just another item that would clutter up the=20 > portage requirements ... but then again, i dont know what the original=20 > intentions were ... It was probably about a year and a half/two years back, before you did the euseradd, etc stuff. libconf is a project Dams did that makes changes to config files transparent to the format being used, and I then he have a few interfaces to it (php, perl, whatever). Its just that then we can do fairly generic config parsing stuff (and might be usefull in the installer project as well). Don't know if Dams want to give a status update/overview ... Dunno, just throwing around ideas. --=20 Martin Schlemmer Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop/System Team Developer Cape Town, South Africa --=-7wgpK6lxLaH4qAW4TKEl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCMD8CqburzKaJYLYRAoJ6AKCQYGP49cExVW3DIO7lnjkSRiDBIACeKQhL KOQ2C3MKzvmu9EuRZiBVgDU= =E1R7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-7wgpK6lxLaH4qAW4TKEl-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list