From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j29Gg13d028851 for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2005 16:42:02 GMT Received: from smtp.nuvox.net ([64.89.70.9] helo=smtp05.gnvlscdb.sys.nuvox.net) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1D94G0-00069u-Dq for gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2005 16:42:00 +0000 Received: from cgianelloni.nuvox.net (216.215.202.4.nw.nuvox.net [216.215.202.4]) by smtp05.gnvlscdb.sys.nuvox.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with SMTP id j29GfulE024235 for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2005 11:41:56 -0500 Received: by cgianelloni.nuvox.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 9 Mar 2005 11:46:05 -0500 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Identifying inherit-only / usable profiles (round 2) From: Chris Gianelloni To: gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <422E8204.6020706@gentoo.org> References: <42224847.1060703@gentoo.org> <42248535.6040602@gentoo.org> <1110220955.9520.212.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> <200503080924.04525.vapier@gentoo.org> <422E8204.6020706@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-tTYDveAONcFdYzq3i50A" Organization: Gentoo Linux Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2005 11:46:03 -0500 Message-Id: <1110386764.9520.262.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 X-Archives-Salt: c09bb0ff-b0e0-4881-b80e-dd5f37fce6dc X-Archives-Hash: 46698f2780931f3bca07f9935ff4797f --=-tTYDveAONcFdYzq3i50A Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 23:56 -0500, Aaron Walker wrote: > Isn't profiles.desc just a list of *default* profiles though? We want a = list > of all valid profiles. So I think we should either extend profiles.desc = to > contain all valid profiles, or add a new file. Either way would be fine by me, but portage would have to be modified to allow for multiple profiles to be listed per arch in profiles.desc > Looking at profiles.desc did make me realize something though. If we do > decided to do a separate file, I think we should list the arch as well al= ong > side the profile, kind of like profiles.desc does. This would allow us t= o get > a list of all valid profiles for a certain arch. >=20 > In the case that I need this for (the eclectic profiles module), it'd be = much > better IMO to be able to show valid profiles for a certain arch since a v= alid > profile for sparc is obviously not a valid profile for x86. >=20 > Having a format of something like: >=20 > alpha default-linux/alpha/2004.3 > alpha default-linux/alpha/2005.0 > ... > x86 default-linux/x86/2004.3 > ... >=20 > would be ideal IMO. >=20 > comments? WORKSFORME ;] --=20 Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead/QA Manager Games - Developer Gentoo Linux --=-tTYDveAONcFdYzq3i50A Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCLyhLkT4lNIS36YERAthJAJ9VnUQSCDIpn3XMeq3YK6C8Nc0jSACfZoVW tuhU573MR6rqR3fbBLTXK5Q= =+h5I -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-tTYDveAONcFdYzq3i50A-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list