public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Please follow keywording policy
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2005 11:43:09 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1110386590.9520.260.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <422EA7E2.4040206@gentoo.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2050 bytes --]

On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 09:38 +0200, Alin Nastac wrote:
> I think the reason people drop arches is laziness of some arch herds. 
> C'mon people, how hard can it be to see if it builds right on your arch?

What arch do you use?  Maybe we should trade in your box for a nice
sparc32 or mips box and see what you have to say then.  Remember that in
many of these arches, all the machines are still measured in Megahertz
and not Gigahertz, and they are quite old.

The arch teams are doing their jobs quite well, don't try to push blame
onto them.  They shouldn't go around marking something stable just
because it builds and should test it.  If they have no way of testing
it, then they don't need to stabilize it.  It won't kill you to have a
single older ebuild in the tree for an arch.  Either that, or you can
remove the keywords, as Jason mentioned, and file a bug against the
package to the mips team so they are aware that keywords have been
dropped from the package and that it will need testing to be
re-keyworded.  Looking over that bug, it really looks like you flipped
out over nothing.  It took them a week to respond.  That isn't very
long, at all.

> Jason Wever wrote:
> 
> >Hi All,
> >
> >I'd like to ask that you all take the time to review the keywording
> >policy in the Developer Handbook.  In particular, I'd like to draw
> >your attention to the section on "Upgrading Ebuilds" [1].
> >
> >People have been getting good lately at either dropping keywords for
> >no reason and/or failing to notify or file a bug with the arches
> >dropped as to why.  Chances are if you have done this for SPARC, you've
> >probably heard from me already.  If not, GenBot is on his way to your
> >location as we speak ;)
> >
> >Now back to your regularly scheduled hack-fu...
> >
> >[1] -
> >http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/devrel/handbook/handbook.xml?part=2&chap=5#doc_chap5
> >
> >Thanks,
> >  
> >
> 
-- 
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering - Strategic Lead/QA Manager
Games - Developer
Gentoo Linux

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-03-09 16:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-03-09  1:55 [gentoo-dev] Please follow keywording policy Jason Wever
2005-03-09  2:00 ` Hasan Khalil
2005-03-09  7:38 ` Alin Nastac
2005-03-09 13:39   ` Stephen P. Becker
2005-03-09 14:50     ` Alin Nastac
2005-03-09 16:22       ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-03-09 17:38         ` Alin Nastac
2005-03-09 18:38           ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-03-09 18:56             ` Alin Nastac
2005-03-09 19:10               ` Stefan Schweizer
2005-03-09 19:10                 ` Stefan Schweizer
2005-03-09 21:30                 ` Luis F. Araujo
2005-03-09 22:57                 ` Alin Nastac
2005-03-09 23:27                   ` Stephen P. Becker
2005-03-10  0:50                     ` Donnie Berkholz
2005-03-10  0:18                       ` Daniel Goller
2005-03-09 23:36                   ` Jason Wever
2005-03-09 23:42                   ` Aron Griffis
2005-03-10  7:54                     ` Alin Nastac
2005-03-10  8:27                       ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-03-10 15:54                         ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-03-10 15:52                       ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-03-10  4:34                   ` Grant Goodyear
2005-03-10  8:36                     ` Alin Nastac
2005-03-10 13:14                       ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-03-10 16:00                       ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-03-10 19:00                         ` Alin Nastac
2005-03-10 19:33                           ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-03-10 21:25                             ` John Myers
2005-03-10 15:38                   ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-03-09 19:18               ` Patrick Lauer
2005-03-09 19:43                 ` Stefan Schweizer
2005-03-09 19:56                   ` Patrick Lauer
2005-03-10  0:55               ` Jon Portnoy
2005-03-10  8:07                 ` Alin Nastac
2005-03-09 19:20             ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-03-09 16:37       ` Stephen P. Becker
2005-03-09 16:43   ` Chris Gianelloni [this message]
2005-03-09 17:40     ` Alin Nastac

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1110386590.9520.260.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net \
    --to=wolf31o2@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox