From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [156.56.111.197]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j1NJL826004019 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 19:21:09 GMT Received: from ctb-mesg6.saix.net ([196.25.240.78]) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1D424K-0007ul-9K for gentoo-dev@robin.gentoo.org; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 19:21:08 +0000 Received: from gateway.lan (wblv-146-240-80.telkomadsl.co.za [165.146.240.80]) by ctb-mesg6.saix.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 254176082 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 21:21:06 +0200 (SAST) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gateway.lan (Postfix) with ESMTP id F37FF3A26C4 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 21:25:35 +0200 (SAST) Received: from gateway.lan ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (gateway.lan [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 09102-05 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 21:25:31 +0200 (SAST) Received: from nosferatu.lan (nosferatu.lan [192.168.0.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher IDEA-CBC-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gateway.lan (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7120F3A26BA for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 21:25:31 +0200 (SAST) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] sys-apps is too big From: Martin Schlemmer Reply-To: Martin Schlemmer To: Gentoo-Dev In-Reply-To: <20050223190035.618a8aab@snowdrop> References: <20050223190035.618a8aab@snowdrop> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-zxXbw5RyXNzzdZlQ2ZZ8" Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 21:23:09 +0200 Message-Id: <1109186589.17471.37.camel@nosferatu.lan> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at nosferatu.za.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 22c5ccf1-a6f9-4f43-a7f7-47c078b0108a X-Archives-Hash: ec224460466ee9d20e5e81f0712ceb65 --=-zxXbw5RyXNzzdZlQ2ZZ8 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2005-02-23 at 19:00 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > sys-storage: or move stuff to sys-fs? If we go how sys-fs looks now, mdadm should go to sys-fs as well, as raidtools, lvm, evms, etc are there already. Also, some things are a bit vague, like hdparm might rather go to sys-hardware. A thought might be to move all these (except hdparm, etc), as well as sys-fs to sys-storage rather. If we really go by sys-fs means to me at least, it probably should only be the fsck's, and devfs/udev that stay there if any. > sys-network: or move stuff to net-*? You might consider them more critical to get the system up, so more system related? > sys-hardware: other hardware related apps (maybe splittable further?) I at least cannot think of 2/4 more meaningful categories for these, as they are fairly diverse. > Regarding sys-bsd... When the *bsd folks get their thing working, we're > going to end up with a fair number of bsdish things in the tree. Since > sys-apps is too frickin' huge, would sys-bsd make sense? >=20 Like spb said - you cannot really group them, as what each contain is very diverse, so I think it should be fine. --=20 Martin Schlemmer Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop/System Team Developer Cape Town, South Africa --=-zxXbw5RyXNzzdZlQ2ZZ8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCHNgdqburzKaJYLYRAvObAKCLQh0slHeMJlNdzaR0vA+hWx8tHgCfTC+G BsqAJqYz5wOG4gx7v6ooxNg= =UmuS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-zxXbw5RyXNzzdZlQ2ZZ8-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list