On Thu, 2004-11-18 at 15:39 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> Ick. I'd be inclined to not use minimal vim for livecds, it's *really*
> stripped down...  What're the deps pulled in by non-minimal vim that you
> don't like?

I honestly have not researched it very far other than to find that vim
(and vim-core) using USE="livecd minimal" came out with a LiveCD that
was nearly 10MB smaller (after squashfs).  Considering the entire x86
minimal LiveCD is 50MB, that is a very significant savings.

-- 
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering - Operational/QA Manager
Games - Developer
Gentoo Linux