* [gentoo-dev] RFC: equery list <pkg> output
@ 2004-10-20 19:55 Christian Hoenig
2004-10-20 20:45 ` Donnie Berkholz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Christian Hoenig @ 2004-10-20 19:55 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I am used to etcat -v <pkg> to get the available packages. And as etcat is
deprecated, I had a look at equery list <pkg>.
And I really wonder, if people prefer an output like this (from current
equery):
$ equery list -i -o -p gentoolkit
[ Searching for package 'gentoolkit' in all categories among: ]
* installed packages
[I--] [ ] app-portage/gentoolkit-0.2.0_pre10 (0)
* Portage tree (/var/portage/tree)
[-P-] [M~] app-portage/gentoolkit-dev-0.2.0_pre2 (0)
[-P-] [M~] app-portage/gentoolkit-dev-0.2.0_pre4 (0)
[-P-] [ ] app-portage/gentoolkit-dev-0.2.0_pre1 (0)
[-P-] [ ] app-portage/gentoolkit-dev-0.2.0_pre3 (0)
[-P-] [ ~] app-portage/gentoolkit-0.2.0_pre9 (0)
[-P-] [ ] app-portage/gentoolkit-0.2.0_pre8 (0)
* overlay tree (/var/portage/overlay)
or in contrast to something like this (which is based on the etcat output):
$ ~/portage/equery.my.old list -i -o -p gentoolkit
Searching for package 'gentoolkit' in all categories among:
* installed packages
* Portage tree (/var/portage/tree)
* overlay tree (/var/portage/overlay)
* app-portage/gentoolkit-dev
[-P-] [ ] app-portage/gentoolkit-dev-0.2.0_pre1 (0)
[-P-] [M~] app-portage/gentoolkit-dev-0.2.0_pre2 (0)
[-P-] [ ] app-portage/gentoolkit-dev-0.2.0_pre3 (0)
[-P-] [M~] app-portage/gentoolkit-dev-0.2.0_pre4 (0)
* app-portage/gentoolkit
[-P-] [ ] app-portage/gentoolkit-0.2.0_pre8 (0)
[-P-] [ ~] app-portage/gentoolkit-0.2.0_pre9 (0)
[I--] [ ] app-portage/gentoolkit-0.2.0_pre10 (0)
I have a patch available for current equery to (additionally) generate the
second output, though I don't know, why one would ever use the first output
over the second output.
I wonder, what people would miss, if current output would totally be exchanged
with my proposed output (based on etcat stuff).
come on and tell me :-)
take care, have fun
/christian
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBdsKZmauZIX3ydQURAhjYAKD8KRk09A9z06qxdgcdZgsyiRIQqACfQpPo
JF78g1HN19y7Pm246WwbQ6E=
=jQ2i
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: equery list <pkg> output
2004-10-20 19:55 [gentoo-dev] RFC: equery list <pkg> output Christian Hoenig
@ 2004-10-20 20:45 ` Donnie Berkholz
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Donnie Berkholz @ 2004-10-20 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
On Wed, 2004-10-20 at 12:55, Christian Hoenig wrote:
> I am used to etcat -v <pkg> to get the available packages. And as etcat is
> deprecated, I had a look at equery list <pkg>.
>
> And I really wonder, if people prefer an output like this (from current
> equery):
I prefer the old output, for one. Please file an enhancement bug at
bugs.gentoo.org so this can be tracked.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-10-20 21:45 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-10-20 19:55 [gentoo-dev] RFC: equery list <pkg> output Christian Hoenig
2004-10-20 20:45 ` Donnie Berkholz
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox