From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26968 invoked from network); 20 Oct 2004 18:15:34 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 20 Oct 2004 18:15:34 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1CKKzm-0004F0-JB for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 18:15:34 +0000 Received: (qmail 7889 invoked by uid 89); 20 Oct 2004 18:15:33 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 9792 invoked from network); 20 Oct 2004 18:15:33 +0000 X-Authenticated: #14792761 From: Alexander =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fut=E1sz?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20041020014358.GA1867@twobit.net> References: <20041020014358.GA1867@twobit.net> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 20:14:43 +0200 Message-Id: <1098296083.9999.1.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage-2.0.51 STABLE TESTING X-Archives-Salt: 4dbcbc07-db0f-4751-8601-2c1bb3197029 X-Archives-Hash: abee5c97ceeed8369050adbdf5833df6 Am Dienstag, den 19.10.2004, 21:43 -0400 schrieb Nicholas Jones: > So... We've had no bug reports on _rc9 that were beyond trivial. > We've added a few more fixes, and now we are quickly pushing 51 > to stable. > > As the changes are quite minor, _rc10 will only be out for the > night and 2.0.51 proper will be released stable early tomorrow > morning (Oct 20, 2004). http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68293 I'm having problems with /etc/portage. Am I the only one? -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list