public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal: patches.gentoo.org
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 16:17:03 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1097612223.22838.4.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <416C370C.1070702@gentoo.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1165 bytes --]

On Tue, 2004-10-12 at 15:57 -0400, Nick Dimiduk wrote:
> Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> 
> > We were talking about this on IRC due to the growing concern over
> > patches and other files in ${FILESDIR} in the portage tree.  This is
> > basically the idea that we came up with to resolve the problem.
> > 
> 
> Why do we need a separate location for patches?  How are they 
> fundamentally different from the sources in distfiles?

Write a patch yourself and add it to /space/disfiles-local and see how
long it takes to get to *all* the mirrors.  Now look at how many bugs
you have for missing files (your patch).

The point is that people want to see the patches removed from
${FILESDIR} and moved to ${DISTDIR}, but the distfiles replication is
too slow for this to work properly.  Because of this, we came up with
this proposal for a temporary location to hold patches that are
available on-demand and immediately, before the distfiles sync takes
place.

Currently, many of us are using dev.gentoo.org for this purpose.  This
proposal is to move this to a supported infrastructure with some
redundancy rather than a single point of failure.


[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-10-12 20:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-10-12 19:09 [gentoo-dev] Proposal: patches.gentoo.org Chris Gianelloni
2004-10-12 19:12 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-10-12 19:32   ` George Shapovalov
2004-10-12 19:33     ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-10-13 12:53   ` Kurt Lieber
2004-10-13 13:28     ` Doug Goldstein
2004-10-12 19:27 ` Marius Mauch
2004-10-12 19:52   ` Beber
2004-10-12 20:11     ` Marius Mauch
2004-10-12 20:10   ` Nicholas Jones
2004-10-12 20:50     ` Jeffrey Forman
2004-10-12 20:57     ` Jeffrey Forman
2004-10-12 23:20       ` Chris Gianelloni
2004-10-13 12:43     ` Kurt Lieber
2004-10-13  9:46   ` Paul de Vrieze
2004-10-13 12:19     ` Lance Albertson
2004-10-13 12:39     ` Kurt Lieber
2004-10-12 19:57 ` Nick Dimiduk
2004-10-12 19:57   ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-10-12 20:17   ` Chris Gianelloni [this message]
2004-10-12 22:04 ` Mike Frysinger
2004-10-13 13:05 ` Kurt Lieber
2004-10-13 15:16   ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-10-14 12:07     ` Kurt Lieber
2004-10-15 15:13       ` Xavier Neys
2004-10-14 20:38 ` Dylan Carlson
2004-10-14 21:05   ` Mark Loeser
2004-10-15  1:00     ` Chris Gianelloni
2004-10-14 22:08   ` [gentoo-dev] Patch filename conventions (WAS: Proposal: patches.gentoo.org) Dylan Carlson
2004-10-14 22:14     ` Mike Frysinger
2004-10-15  2:20       ` Dylan Carlson
2004-10-15  2:58         ` Donnie Berkholz
2004-10-15  4:24           ` Dylan Carlson
2004-10-15  5:13             ` Donnie Berkholz
2004-10-15  6:01               ` Dylan Carlson
2004-10-15  6:04       ` Robin H. Johnson
2004-10-15 12:16         ` Kurt Lieber
2004-10-15  0:49   ` [gentoo-dev] Proposal: patches.gentoo.org Chris Gianelloni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1097612223.22838.4.camel@localhost \
    --to=wolf31o2@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox