From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19526 invoked from network); 19 Sep 2004 21:14:05 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 19 Sep 2004 21:14:05 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1C990e-0007g8-4u for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 19 Sep 2004 21:14:12 +0000 Received: (qmail 25298 invoked by uid 89); 19 Sep 2004 21:14:03 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 1151 invoked from network); 19 Sep 2004 21:14:03 +0000 From: Ned Ludd Reply-To: solar@gentoo.org To: seemant@gentoo.org Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org, g2boojum@gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <1095616848.18232.1.camel@sephora> References: <20040919164849.5ed9b407@snowdrop.home> <1095616848.18232.1.camel@sephora> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-y4PTsYgOol6aHY1rtJq7" Organization: Gentoo (hardened,security,infrastructure,embedded,toolchain) Developer Message-Id: <1095628399.20147.4839.camel@simple> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 17:13:19 -0400 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] s390 status X-Archives-Salt: 6427db24-960e-4415-811a-933a43250b8a X-Archives-Hash: 3b8d2f6643caa30905a8e5d2287bf87a --=-y4PTsYgOol6aHY1rtJq7 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 2004-09-19 at 14:00, Seemant Kulleen wrote: > Before Randy left, he'd promised to give me access to his s390, but that > never materialised, so at this point I'd say there's no access. Seeing > as it's effectively an unmaintained port with no ETA on Randy, I say > either remove s390 from KEYWORDS which it blocks or stable it and let > the fallout happen when s390 returns to being an active port. Letting it fallout would simplify the job of the security team. I think we can/should revisit it and it's keywords when we have a developers and some sort of resources other developers can test on/with.=20 Grant please add this as an item to discuss at Mondays meeting.=20 (Should we drop the s390 port for now?) --=20 Ned Ludd Gentoo (hardened,security,infrastructure,embedded,toolchain) Developer --=-y4PTsYgOol6aHY1rtJq7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBBTfZv94CCfB4KcwwRAqe/AKDC8wd4d0z++NLtHkhSbRND/lwQiQCeI+nh dpZCC6CuhAJiHeMt6ZvrGR0= =oQDb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-y4PTsYgOol6aHY1rtJq7--