On Sun, 2004-09-19 at 14:00, Seemant Kulleen wrote: > Before Randy left, he'd promised to give me access to his s390, but that > never materialised, so at this point I'd say there's no access. Seeing > as it's effectively an unmaintained port with no ETA on Randy, I say > either remove s390 from KEYWORDS which it blocks or stable it and let > the fallout happen when s390 returns to being an active port. Letting it fallout would simplify the job of the security team. I think we can/should revisit it and it's keywords when we have a developers and some sort of resources other developers can test on/with. Grant please add this as an item to discuss at Mondays meeting. (Should we drop the s390 port for now?) -- Ned Ludd Gentoo (hardened,security,infrastructure,embedded,toolchain) Developer