public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lisa Seelye <lisa@gentoo.org>
To: Klavs Klavsen <kl@vsen.dk>
Cc: lisa@gentoo.org, gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Do we want optimal performance?
Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2004 15:41:30 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1094672489.2427.5.camel@lisa.thedoh.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <33333.10.0.0.51.1094638559.squirrel@10.0.0.51>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 994 bytes --]

On Wed, 2004-09-08 at 06:15, Klavs Klavsen wrote:
> Hi guys,
> 
> Just read an interesting article about Xeon vs. Opteron from anandtech -
> where they really show how much difference compile optimizations (or not)
> does - and how it differs for different programs for different processors.

To me the phrase "optimal performance" means that all of the programs I
use compile, run, are stable, and give a respectable "response time." 
Who cares if Apache serves up your pages 0.005 seconds faster as long as
they're served up in a respectable time?

I laugh at the people who run with every cflag optimisation they can
because chances are there's no real reason for them to need such
optimisation at such a risk for buggy behavior.

I think that the people who /need/ these optimisations will know what
they're doing in advance and how to customise their cflags accordingly.

-- 
Regards,
Lisa Seelye
Key fingerprint = 09CF 52D6 B82B 72B9 97A7  601B CB46 B556 1E49 6FC5

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-09-08 19:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-09-08 10:15 [gentoo-dev] Do we want optimal performance? Klavs Klavsen
2004-09-08 11:29 ` Paul de Vrieze
2004-09-08 12:03   ` Corvus Corax
2004-09-08 13:16     ` Paul de Vrieze
2004-09-08 12:19 ` Alin Nastac
2004-09-08 13:24   ` Marcus D. Hanwell
2004-09-08 13:43     ` Patrick Lauer
2004-09-08 14:21     ` Klavs Klavsen
2004-09-09  7:52       ` Paul de Vrieze
2004-09-08 12:49 ` Spider
2004-09-08 17:16   ` Robert Moss
2004-09-08 18:20 ` Chris Gianelloni
2004-09-08 19:11   ` Klavs Klavsen
2004-09-08 19:54     ` Paul de Vrieze
2004-09-08 20:05     ` Marcus D. Hanwell
2004-09-08 19:41 ` Lisa Seelye [this message]
2004-09-09  0:49 ` Daniel Goller
2004-09-09  1:51   ` [gentoo-dev] per package cflags (was Re: Do we want optimal performance?) Travis Tilley
2004-09-09  2:26     ` Robin H. Johnson
2004-09-09  3:42       ` Ned Ludd
2004-09-09  3:49         ` Robin H. Johnson
2004-09-09 17:23           ` Robert Moss
2004-09-09  4:41         ` Will Buckner
2004-09-09  4:51           ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-09-09  6:07   ` [gentoo-dev] Do we want optimal performance? Klavs Klavsen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1094672489.2427.5.camel@lisa.thedoh.com \
    --to=lisa@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    --cc=kl@vsen.dk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox