From: Lisa Seelye <lisa@gentoo.org>
To: Klavs Klavsen <kl@vsen.dk>
Cc: lisa@gentoo.org, gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Do we want optimal performance?
Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2004 15:41:30 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1094672489.2427.5.camel@lisa.thedoh.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <33333.10.0.0.51.1094638559.squirrel@10.0.0.51>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 994 bytes --]
On Wed, 2004-09-08 at 06:15, Klavs Klavsen wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Just read an interesting article about Xeon vs. Opteron from anandtech -
> where they really show how much difference compile optimizations (or not)
> does - and how it differs for different programs for different processors.
To me the phrase "optimal performance" means that all of the programs I
use compile, run, are stable, and give a respectable "response time."
Who cares if Apache serves up your pages 0.005 seconds faster as long as
they're served up in a respectable time?
I laugh at the people who run with every cflag optimisation they can
because chances are there's no real reason for them to need such
optimisation at such a risk for buggy behavior.
I think that the people who /need/ these optimisations will know what
they're doing in advance and how to customise their cflags accordingly.
--
Regards,
Lisa Seelye
Key fingerprint = 09CF 52D6 B82B 72B9 97A7 601B CB46 B556 1E49 6FC5
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-08 19:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-08 10:15 [gentoo-dev] Do we want optimal performance? Klavs Klavsen
2004-09-08 11:29 ` Paul de Vrieze
2004-09-08 12:03 ` Corvus Corax
2004-09-08 13:16 ` Paul de Vrieze
2004-09-08 12:19 ` Alin Nastac
2004-09-08 13:24 ` Marcus D. Hanwell
2004-09-08 13:43 ` Patrick Lauer
2004-09-08 14:21 ` Klavs Klavsen
2004-09-09 7:52 ` Paul de Vrieze
2004-09-08 12:49 ` Spider
2004-09-08 17:16 ` Robert Moss
2004-09-08 18:20 ` Chris Gianelloni
2004-09-08 19:11 ` Klavs Klavsen
2004-09-08 19:54 ` Paul de Vrieze
2004-09-08 20:05 ` Marcus D. Hanwell
2004-09-08 19:41 ` Lisa Seelye [this message]
2004-09-09 0:49 ` Daniel Goller
2004-09-09 1:51 ` [gentoo-dev] per package cflags (was Re: Do we want optimal performance?) Travis Tilley
2004-09-09 2:26 ` Robin H. Johnson
2004-09-09 3:42 ` Ned Ludd
2004-09-09 3:49 ` Robin H. Johnson
2004-09-09 17:23 ` Robert Moss
2004-09-09 4:41 ` Will Buckner
2004-09-09 4:51 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-09-09 6:07 ` [gentoo-dev] Do we want optimal performance? Klavs Klavsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1094672489.2427.5.camel@lisa.thedoh.com \
--to=lisa@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
--cc=kl@vsen.dk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox