From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8810 invoked from network); 6 Sep 2004 09:02:20 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 6 Sep 2004 09:02:20 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1C4FOG-0001nB-0G for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 06 Sep 2004 09:02:20 +0000 Received: (qmail 10374 invoked by uid 89); 6 Sep 2004 09:02:03 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 9148 invoked from network); 6 Sep 2004 09:02:03 +0000 Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2004 04:02:24 -0500 From: Brian Harring In-reply-to: <200409052258.48457.norberto+gentoo-dev@bensa.ath.cx> To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: Norberto Bensa Reply-to: ferringb@gentoo.org Message-id: <1094461343.19100.5.camel@6-allhosts> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Content-type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-mzxh5QA6A0kJiEVmYUBO" X-Spam-Report: TrustedSender=yes, SenderIP=128.104.50.130 X-Spam-PmxInfo: Server=avs-6, Version=4.7.0.111621, Antispam-Engine: 2.0.0.0, Antispam-Data: 2004.9.5.0, SenderIP=128.104.50.130 References: <200409051342.17414.norberto+gentoo-dev@bensa.ath.cx> <200409051610.24456.norberto+gentoo-dev@bensa.ath.cx> <200409060823.17852.jstubbs@gentoo.org> <200409052258.48457.norberto+gentoo-dev@bensa.ath.cx> Subject: [gentoo-dev] read only distdir and fully fetched files w/ portage 2.0.51_pre20 X-Archives-Salt: 4085e9e8-9d8a-4f49-bb92-90ea324dbe3e X-Archives-Hash: e89031a94b26b544b106ad48d63807da --=-mzxh5QA6A0kJiEVmYUBO Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 2004-09-05 at 20:58, Norberto Bensa wrote: > Jason Stubbs wrote: > > portage-2.0.50_pre20 no longer does fetching as root. Make sure that > > the /usr/portage directory also has write access by the portage group a= nd > > it should work. >=20 > Ermm.... This is a RO-NFS shared distfiles and the file was already fetch= ed.=20 Get out the paddles, that one is my fault. I've filed a bug for it- http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D62985 and corrected it in cvs. Basically it was a typo in the fetch function, that by luck slipped by- instead of=20 if fetched !=3D 2: Which tests a var that reflects the files status (fully fetched, partially, or non-existant), it was if fetch !=3D 2: Kind of entertaining... it was comparing the fetch function against an int :) > Thanks. I've reverted to 2.0.50-r10 until those hiccups are fixed ;) I attached a patch to #62985 that should fix things up for you. If it doesn't, please post to the bug. Note this only affects readonly distdir's, so general userbase shouldn't hit it. ~brian --=-mzxh5QA6A0kJiEVmYUBO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBBPCefvdBxRoA3VU0RAo8fAKCes6r4X+Wn+RaZtA2j7VVxsiGldgCeL8lx IeHl4zK8Y0q7xgefy4OqjEE= =YH4e -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-mzxh5QA6A0kJiEVmYUBO--