From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18159 invoked from network); 5 Sep 2004 03:52:07 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 5 Sep 2004 03:52:07 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1C3o4T-0003qW-Vc for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 05 Sep 2004 03:52:06 +0000 Received: (qmail 17276 invoked by uid 89); 5 Sep 2004 03:52:04 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 15477 invoked from network); 5 Sep 2004 03:52:03 +0000 From: Ned Ludd Reply-To: solar@gentoo.org To: Lance Albertson Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <1094265199.26839.2.camel@pursuit> References: <1094227795.20758.37.camel@lisa.thedoh.com> <20040903171424.7ce61054@snowdrop.home> <1094236423.20758.45.camel@lisa.thedoh.com> <1094265199.26839.2.camel@pursuit> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-tFNrHXTbzPF2D5EHy9RY" Organization: Gentoo (hardened,security,infrastructure,embedded,toolchain) Developer Message-Id: <1094356277.31592.6431.camel@simple> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2004 23:51:17 -0400 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Should significant changes to arch be posted to -announce mail list? X-Archives-Salt: 117323ba-102b-472f-b4d3-474cc7f8c4e9 X-Archives-Hash: 27be22d8133cd47ecf9f992f96f6d25c --=-tFNrHXTbzPF2D5EHy9RY Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2004-09-03 at 22:33, Lance Albertson wrote: > On Fri, 2004-09-03 at 13:33, Lisa Seelye wrote: > > On Fri, 2004-09-03 at 12:14, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > > On Fri, 03 Sep 2004 12:09:55 -0400 Lisa Seelye wrot= e: > > > | I think they should. Having new blockers come up on an arch box wh= en > > > | attempting to update is a little worrysome. Or having a new way of > > > | doing things (such as the inevitable move to udev in lieu of devfs)= . > > > |=20 > > > | The things that I would hope to see in such an announcement would b= e a > > > | suitable upgrade path, reason for change, and a link to gentoo-dev > > > | discussion if available. > > >=20 > > > For sparc and mips, announcements (and often pre-announcements) are s= ent > > > to the gentoo-sparc/gentoo-mips lists. I'd imagine most other archs d= o > > > the same. > >=20 > > Fair enough. I didn't see any x86 (or any other arch) announce list so > > I figured I'd get the ball rolling. >=20 > Is there an gentoo-x86 ML ? I'd think that would be an excellent > addition to our current structure. We already have mailing lists for the > other archs, why not x86? I know that x86 is the biggest user for > Gentoo, but if we need to get out x86 specific stuff, I'd think an x86 > ML would be ideal. Thoughts? This is a good idea. --=20 Ned Ludd Gentoo (hardened,security,infrastructure,embedded,toolchain) Developer --=-tFNrHXTbzPF2D5EHy9RY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBBOo0194CCfB4KcwwRAi61AJ9OOH/r1Mn6jzR9L1jNr9oVO8xMFgCfcwjy W8soI2yvq5+GNKyQPIhmrY4= =iw/6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-tFNrHXTbzPF2D5EHy9RY--