On Fri, 2004-09-03 at 22:33, Lance Albertson wrote: > On Fri, 2004-09-03 at 13:33, Lisa Seelye wrote: > > On Fri, 2004-09-03 at 12:14, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > > On Fri, 03 Sep 2004 12:09:55 -0400 Lisa Seelye wrote: > > > | I think they should. Having new blockers come up on an arch box when > > > | attempting to update is a little worrysome. Or having a new way of > > > | doing things (such as the inevitable move to udev in lieu of devfs). > > > | > > > | The things that I would hope to see in such an announcement would be a > > > | suitable upgrade path, reason for change, and a link to gentoo-dev > > > | discussion if available. > > > > > > For sparc and mips, announcements (and often pre-announcements) are sent > > > to the gentoo-sparc/gentoo-mips lists. I'd imagine most other archs do > > > the same. > > > > Fair enough. I didn't see any x86 (or any other arch) announce list so > > I figured I'd get the ball rolling. > > Is there an gentoo-x86 ML ? I'd think that would be an excellent > addition to our current structure. We already have mailing lists for the > other archs, why not x86? I know that x86 is the biggest user for > Gentoo, but if we need to get out x86 specific stuff, I'd think an x86 > ML would be ideal. Thoughts? This is a good idea. -- Ned Ludd Gentoo (hardened,security,infrastructure,embedded,toolchain) Developer