From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25073 invoked from network); 4 Sep 2004 02:30:33 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 4 Sep 2004 02:30:33 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1C3QK0-0004CH-2U for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sat, 04 Sep 2004 02:30:32 +0000 Received: (qmail 21672 invoked by uid 89); 4 Sep 2004 02:30:30 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 30962 invoked from network); 4 Sep 2004 02:30:30 +0000 From: Lance Albertson To: lisa@gentoo.org Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <1094236423.20758.45.camel@lisa.thedoh.com> References: <1094227795.20758.37.camel@lisa.thedoh.com> <20040903171424.7ce61054@snowdrop.home> <1094236423.20758.45.camel@lisa.thedoh.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-E7ujDQJ0iyXdJmtXsOQD" Message-Id: <1094265199.26839.2.camel@pursuit> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2004 21:33:20 -0500 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Should significant changes to arch be posted to -announce mail list? X-Archives-Salt: bee6836f-1164-4866-8c20-2b43e6d1cf47 X-Archives-Hash: a0bcb5a1559d993bf3d9db8a3f7d2d5e --=-E7ujDQJ0iyXdJmtXsOQD Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2004-09-03 at 13:33, Lisa Seelye wrote: > On Fri, 2004-09-03 at 12:14, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > On Fri, 03 Sep 2004 12:09:55 -0400 Lisa Seelye wrote: > > | I think they should. Having new blockers come up on an arch box when > > | attempting to update is a little worrysome. Or having a new way of > > | doing things (such as the inevitable move to udev in lieu of devfs). > > |=20 > > | The things that I would hope to see in such an announcement would be = a > > | suitable upgrade path, reason for change, and a link to gentoo-dev > > | discussion if available. > >=20 > > For sparc and mips, announcements (and often pre-announcements) are sen= t > > to the gentoo-sparc/gentoo-mips lists. I'd imagine most other archs do > > the same. >=20 > Fair enough. I didn't see any x86 (or any other arch) announce list so > I figured I'd get the ball rolling. Is there an gentoo-x86 ML ? I'd think that would be an excellent addition to our current structure. We already have mailing lists for the other archs, why not x86? I know that x86 is the biggest user for Gentoo, but if we need to get out x86 specific stuff, I'd think an x86 ML would be ideal. Thoughts? --=20 Lance Albertson Gentoo Infrastructure --- GPG Public Key: Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A 1282 5AB1 4D07 416F A15D 27F4 B742 ramereth/irc.freenode.net --=-E7ujDQJ0iyXdJmtXsOQD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBBOSluQW+hXSf0t0IRAkXgAKDYtDPJtqXc+2vzkvZOiZnnqJTEdACguksr BB9L4OzkOiffIbQNAZ4vinA= =2/8W -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-E7ujDQJ0iyXdJmtXsOQD--