From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <gentoo-dev-return-15514-arch-gentoo-dev=gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org> Received: (qmail 915 invoked from network); 4 Sep 2004 00:18:24 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 4 Sep 2004 00:18:24 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1C3OG7-0003Kw-Sx for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sat, 04 Sep 2004 00:18:23 +0000 Received: (qmail 32550 invoked by uid 89); 4 Sep 2004 00:18:23 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-unsubscribe@gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-subscribe@gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 20082 invoked from network); 4 Sep 2004 00:18:22 +0000 From: William Kenworthy <billk@iinet.net.au> Reply-To: billk@iinet.net.au To: Luke-Jr <luke-jr@utopios.org>, gentoo-dev List <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200409031750.32517.luke-jr@utopios.org> References: <20040903125147.GB6307@gentoo.org> <20040903155522.3850f2e4@snowdrop.home> <200409031346.43357.vapier@gentoo.org> <200409031750.32517.luke-jr@utopios.org> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Home! Message-Id: <1094257095.10749.36.camel@rattus.Localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2004 08:18:15 +0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Idea for change of emerge -up output X-Archives-Salt: c5f05a10-df7c-429e-8c9d-c60f307c9452 X-Archives-Hash: 265dd04068dd40656f56a9043fe9f4bf Can you describe how changing the inject function will improve portage use - seems a real step backward from a user point of view. For an example of the problems this type of change causes check out the many posts on package.keywords - complicated matters for users. As well I have two systems that work fine, and one that ignores anything in package.mask! Are we going down the path of complicating gentoo and reaping mandrake like rewards (an overcomplicated, fragile management system for the distro) by doing so? BillK On Sat, 2004-09-04 at 01:50, Luke-Jr wrote: > On Friday 03 September 2004 5:46 pm, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Friday 03 September 2004 10:55 am, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > > Well, inject should never be used as a matter of course, so I don't > > > think this is a reasonable objection really... > > -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list