From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21664 invoked from network); 3 Sep 2004 12:02:37 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 3 Sep 2004 12:02:37 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1C3Cm4-0000kH-Pd for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 03 Sep 2004 12:02:37 +0000 Received: (qmail 16503 invoked by uid 89); 3 Sep 2004 12:02:36 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 2200 invoked from network); 3 Sep 2004 12:02:35 +0000 From: William Kenworthy Reply-To: billk@iinet.net.au To: tigger@gentoo.org Cc: gentoo-dev List In-Reply-To: <20040903125147.GB6307@gentoo.org> References: <20040903125147.GB6307@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Home! Message-Id: <1094212950.10178.3.camel@rattus.Localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2004 20:02:30 +0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Idea for change of emerge -up output X-Archives-Salt: 5b4913c5-f4d2-4772-bf15-825ebebeb7f8 X-Archives-Hash: 8c654ae0234b76182376da166c6741eb your going to break an awful lot of user scripts that expect the current behaviour. It might be better to add that functionality as -P (capitalise) or similar for compatibility. BillK On Fri, 2004-09-03 at 20:51, tigger@gentoo.org wrote: > Hi all, > > The current output of emerge -p is difficult to machine parse because > its difficult to split the package name and package version. However, > its easy for emerge to output the two differently. > > I'd like to suggest that its changed from: > > [ebuild U ] app-text/ghostscript-7.07.1-r5 [7.07.1-r3] > > To: > > [ebuild U ] app-text/ghostscript [7.07.1-r5] [7.07.1-r3] > > Does anyone have any (reasonable) objections to this? > > Cheers, > > Rob -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list