From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10178 invoked from network); 31 Aug 2004 21:54:15 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 31 Aug 2004 21:54:15 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1C2GZy-0004db-M3 for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 21:54:14 +0000 Received: (qmail 5355 invoked by uid 89); 31 Aug 2004 21:54:14 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 29496 invoked from network); 31 Aug 2004 21:54:14 +0000 From: Chris Gianelloni Reply-To: wolf31o2@gentoo.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <52d1aa13e7ad93c6acba03290facc9bb@mudra> References: <52d1aa13e7ad93c6acba03290facc9bb@mudra> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-BNirOrhFmIJCuiEQe4kp" Organization: Gentoo Linux Message-Id: <1093989717.19063.254.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 18:01:57 -0400 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman failing (seemingly) incorrectly X-Archives-Salt: 1fd77081-7acb-4b54-abf9-566fa9c1f07d X-Archives-Hash: 2860b43af4abd3be539d8de4541c521f --=-BNirOrhFmIJCuiEQe4kp Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2004-08-31 at 17:40, Armando Di Cianno wrote: > Before I file a bug on repoman, I thought I'd toss this out there, and=20 > see what everyone thinks. This problem I'm having is just about to=20 > drive me crazy, and, since I'd rather not ignore repoman, I'm not sure=20 > what to do. >=20 > My problem is chronicled here: > http://dev.gentoo.org/~fafhrd/whydoesrepomanhateme.html >=20 > ... if anyone has a moment, _please_ read over that page, and smack me=20 > over the head (if need be) to point out what's wrong, or let me know=20 > if you're stumped to. It looks like you need to apply the virtuals to the non-stacked profiles, also. This would be something like the default-x86-2004.2/virtuals file in each profile. Yes, this is a PITA. Yes, this is why we are moving to stacked profiles. --=20 Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Operations/QA Manager Games - Developer Gentoo Linux Is your power animal a penguin? --=-BNirOrhFmIJCuiEQe4kp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBBNPVUkT4lNIS36YERAjjgAJ9pB7BAyQifefmS/OBC+3/ehdT16ACgqjpq ugoGADzUDS2erFOVQM07l0Q= =pIvD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-BNirOrhFmIJCuiEQe4kp--