From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev-return-15262-arch-gentoo-dev=gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: (qmail 18257 invoked from network); 26 Aug 2004 06:21:50 +0000
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197)
  by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 26 Aug 2004 06:21:50 +0000
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org)
	by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
	id 1C0Ddm-0000f4-KG
	for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 06:21:47 +0000
Received: (qmail 17604 invoked by uid 89); 26 Aug 2004 06:21:26 +0000
Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Received: (qmail 15598 invoked from network); 26 Aug 2004 06:21:26 +0000
From: Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
In-Reply-To: <20040825232048.3eca43f3@voyager.weeve.org>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0408241907500.31215@stargazer.weeve.org>
	 <1093441861.31835.9.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net>
	 <20040825212237.525af76a@voyager.weeve.org>
	 <1093495787.9888.14.camel@localhost>
	 <20040825232048.3eca43f3@voyager.weeve.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-l8mnBERr07TjsU696geQ"
Message-Id: <1093501150.9888.19.camel@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 01:19:10 -0500
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.43
X-Apparently-From: ERR_USER_NULL
X-AOL-IP: 64.12.118.81
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Ebuild bumping policy wrt KEYWORDS
X-Archives-Salt: f42144e1-80aa-43bd-8e22-69f9e866204d
X-Archives-Hash: 0e695792496e5a07b996f4d96284b707

--=-l8mnBERr07TjsU696geQ
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, 2004-08-26 at 00:20, Jason Wever wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 23:49:47 -0500
> Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@gentoo.org> wrote:
>=20
> > I also would hesitate to auto-~arch fairly critical packages, such as X
> > or anything in system.
>=20
> For larger || more troublesome || tool-chain type packages, we've
> historically worked with the package maintainers in keywording new
> versions to help with this.  In cases like this that is
> acceptable/agreeable.  This might be a fine print item for that portion o=
f
> the handbook.
>=20
> Personally, I would rather run into a package breaking in a revbump than
> have it be missing keywords and not notified that it was behind.

I'm sorry, I took it as a given that the archs would be notified in this
case. I guess I shouldn't have. =3D)
--=20
Donnie Berkholz
Gentoo Linux

--=-l8mnBERr07TjsU696geQ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBBLYDeXVaO67S1rtsRAodvAJ9ZD00001MBeXNObzLAJohKZOnGOQCeLmp+
hyVvAjDbdClcORSffMyLrek=
=Up0P
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-l8mnBERr07TjsU696geQ--