On Thu, 2004-08-26 at 00:20, Jason Wever wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 23:49:47 -0500
> Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@gentoo.org> wrote:
> 
> > I also would hesitate to auto-~arch fairly critical packages, such as X
> > or anything in system.
> 
> For larger || more troublesome || tool-chain type packages, we've
> historically worked with the package maintainers in keywording new
> versions to help with this.  In cases like this that is
> acceptable/agreeable.  This might be a fine print item for that portion of
> the handbook.
> 
> Personally, I would rather run into a package breaking in a revbump than
> have it be missing keywords and not notified that it was behind.

I'm sorry, I took it as a given that the archs would be notified in this
case. I guess I shouldn't have. =)
-- 
Donnie Berkholz
Gentoo Linux