From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <gentoo-dev-return-15243-arch-gentoo-dev=gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org> Received: (qmail 27543 invoked from network); 25 Aug 2004 22:39:29 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 25 Aug 2004 22:39:29 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1C06QS-0003z3-Lr for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 22:39:28 +0000 Received: (qmail 28121 invoked by uid 89); 25 Aug 2004 22:39:28 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-unsubscribe@gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-subscribe@gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 10131 invoked from network); 25 Aug 2004 22:39:28 +0000 From: Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@gentoo.org> Reply-To: wolf31o2@gentoo.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20040825201312.GD9706@kroah.com> References: <412CD487.5040705@gentoo.org> <20040825182258.GC30125@kroah.com> <ea440b1d04082511344643961c@mail.gmail.com> <20040825194020.GA9706@kroah.com> <20040825210013.513f0664@snowdrop.home> <20040825201312.GD9706@kroah.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-MIzk2AGy4SLgrQn01jaF" Organization: Gentoo Linux Message-Id: <1093473709.31835.87.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 18:41:49 -0400 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] devleopment sources are no longer 'development' - example X-Archives-Salt: 3b9dd729-4903-45c6-aff5-82204052557b X-Archives-Hash: efd26945ec91d72d712363d091d50c9e --=-MIzk2AGy4SLgrQn01jaF Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2004-08-25 at 16:13, Greg KH wrote: > But then what is preventing us from having both a 2.4 and 2.6 version of > gentoo-sources? Is it the following statement in that same file: Nothing... which was why we had the vote at the manager's meeting.=20 While I have planned out a fairly extensive timeline, if the kernel developers decided they wished to merge the two, I would think that is their prerogative. Kernels are already SLOTted based on their version, so I don't think it would cause a problem. All we would have to do is be sure to document that if a user wants to stick with a 2.4 gentoo-sources, that they should p.mask >=3Dsys-kernel/gentoo-sources-2.5* --=20 Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Operations/QA Manager Games - Developer Gentoo Linux Is your power animal a penguin? --=-MIzk2AGy4SLgrQn01jaF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBBLRWtkT4lNIS36YERAi2BAJ9f1bRILG3zPXOf5azc+fbiFHATOgCgi2av s/aMQrSl+hqaY+1bwdSMiao= =h2n1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-MIzk2AGy4SLgrQn01jaF--