From: Brian Harring <ferringb@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Blog GLEP
Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2004 22:56:47 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1092628606.1555.70.camel@6-allhosts> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200408152342.28286.carlo@gentoo.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2323 bytes --]
On Sun, 2004-08-15 at 16:42, Carsten Lohrke wrote:
> Um, this wasn't the request to send me example urls. I know what a blog is. I
> still don't see the purpose. It's always the view point of a single
> individual, which is pretty uninteresting in the long run. It's like having
> subscribed a newspaper and reading only the articles from a single author.
This analogy kind of sucks, frankly- a paper is providing news, doesn't
really matter much which author (granted the quality of the article is
dependant on the author). Where gentoo blogs would shine, is in giving
devs a way to actually expose to the community info about the
goofy/neato lil project they're working on. I'm not going to go to
alexander's blog if I want to see what's going on embedded wise, I'd go
to spanky/vapiers or solar's.
>
> And no, I don't have the time or interest to read multiple blogs.
Fair enough, don't maintain a blog then. :-)
People keep pointing out that this will detract resources/time that
could be allocated elsewhere; the only true resources that would be
required is hosting/maintenance of the software (infra). The decision
of whether it's ultimately a worthy use of resources would fall to them
imo.
If a dev wishes to maintain a blog, it's their choice, and it's their
time to allocate as they see fit.
> We have the GWN already. Why not adding a "opinion" section?
You're trivializing blogs by assuming it's automatically going to be
opinion drivel; this may be the case, but honestly, that's the author's
discretion. If this goes ahead, and all the blogs are is opinion's,
fine, we yank it (they can host their own blog if they want to expound
on why vim rocks and emacs sucks).
To head off the "if they're doing something interesting, and want to let
people know about it they should get it into the gwn", sure, except most
devs likely won't- we've had the gwn for at least a year or two, and the
only bits that make it into the gwn are typically notices about upcoming
things users need to be aware of. In my eyes, the GWN is a user
resource; blogs would function as a dev resource, a way to get info out
there for those users who might be interested.
Pretty much, give them a shot. If gentoo-blogs suck, we ixnay the
project, and a lesson learned.
~brian
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-16 3:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-15 14:29 [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Blog GLEP Alexander Plank
2004-08-15 14:51 ` Jason Stubbs
2004-08-15 14:54 ` Stuart Herbert
2004-08-15 15:01 ` Kurt Lieber
2004-08-15 15:07 ` Stuart Herbert
2004-08-15 15:12 ` Kurt Lieber
2004-08-15 15:22 ` Alexander Plank
2004-08-15 18:30 ` Mike Frysinger
2004-08-15 18:37 ` Stuart Herbert
2004-08-15 18:46 ` Ioannis Aslanidis
2004-08-15 18:47 ` Alexander Plank
2004-08-15 19:06 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-08-15 19:56 ` Bryan D. Stine
2004-08-15 20:09 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-08-15 20:16 ` Mike Frysinger
2004-08-15 20:22 ` Alexander Plank
2004-08-15 21:24 ` Jason Huebel
2004-08-15 21:27 ` Alexander Plank
2004-08-15 21:27 ` Patrick Audley
2004-08-15 21:02 ` Carsten Lohrke
2004-08-15 21:16 ` Alexander Plank
2004-08-15 21:42 ` Carsten Lohrke
2004-08-15 21:51 ` Alexander Plank
2004-08-16 3:56 ` Brian Harring [this message]
2004-08-17 19:10 ` Carsten Lohrke
2004-08-17 19:28 ` Sami Samhuri
2004-08-17 19:52 ` Olivier Crete
2004-08-15 21:24 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-08-22 0:56 ` Karl Trygve Kalleberg
2004-08-17 18:01 ` Jeremy Maitin-Shepard
2004-08-17 18:42 ` Ioannis Aslanidis
2004-08-17 21:59 ` Jeremy Maitin-Shepard
2004-08-17 23:08 ` Joshua Brindle
2004-08-17 23:23 ` Jeremy Maitin-Shepard
2004-08-17 23:30 ` Peter Johanson
2004-08-18 0:56 ` Jeremy Maitin-Shepard
2004-08-18 9:54 ` foser
2004-08-18 21:30 ` Sven Vermeulen
2004-08-19 3:40 ` Hasan Khalil
2004-08-19 9:26 ` Kurt Lieber
2004-08-19 10:00 ` foser
2004-08-19 10:43 ` Paul de Vrieze
2004-08-19 12:38 ` Kurt Lieber
2004-08-19 13:03 ` foser
2004-08-19 18:46 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2004-08-18 1:06 ` [gentoo-dev] " Tom Hosiawa
2004-08-18 4:36 ` Hasan Khalil
2004-08-18 18:47 ` [gentoo-dev] Wikis (was: Gentoo Blog GLEP) Corey Shields
2004-08-18 19:57 ` [gentoo-dev] Wikis Jeremy Maitin-Shepard
2004-08-18 21:43 ` Sven Vermeulen
2004-08-18 22:35 ` Jeremy Maitin-Shepard
2004-08-19 9:57 ` Paul de Vrieze
2004-08-20 10:31 ` Stroller
2004-08-20 10:46 ` Niels Vandekeybus
2004-08-21 17:12 ` Sven Vermeulen
2004-08-18 20:52 ` Joshua Brindle
2004-08-19 7:27 ` Sven Vermeulen
2004-08-19 10:19 ` [gentoo-dev] About blogs & wikis Xavier Neys
2004-08-19 23:03 ` Hasan Khalil
2004-08-20 10:32 ` Aaron Walker
2004-08-22 13:49 ` [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Blog GLEP Robert Moss
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1092628606.1555.70.camel@6-allhosts \
--to=ferringb@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox