From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8148 invoked from network); 10 Aug 2004 14:53:31 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 10 Aug 2004 14:53:31 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BuY0J-0005xe-8a for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 14:53:31 +0000 Received: (qmail 1369 invoked by uid 89); 10 Aug 2004 14:53:30 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 17381 invoked from network); 10 Aug 2004 14:53:30 +0000 From: Chris Gianelloni Reply-To: wolf31o2@gentoo.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <200408100927.38713.cshields@gentoo.org> References: <20040808185144.GB29077@mail.lieber.org> <200408100826.35272.cshields@gentoo.org> <1092145722.21441.39.camel@localhost> <200408100927.38713.cshields@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-00FePgcoZlH5/0sihXfU" Organization: Gentoo Linux Message-Id: <1092150204.21439.75.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 11:03:24 -0400 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 19, reloaded (again) X-Archives-Salt: da9e1f6d-eeb3-4b2f-8f4c-c0229e1c9c51 X-Archives-Hash: b2efcdb4c379b28daa6eb092bd584c57 --=-00FePgcoZlH5/0sihXfU Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2004-08-10 at 10:27, Corey Shields wrote: > On Tuesday 10 August 2004 08:48 am, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > > I guess when I hear stable, I think *UN*changing... not "changing less > > often". Adding "some" stability is not what our users are asking for > > from us. They are asking for a "stable" tree. A single tree cannot > > provide this. Having a "bleeding" and a "stable" tree cannot provide >=20 > how do you provide security updates without changing the tree? That is = the=20 > only thing that would change in this tree (until a new "release" is made,= =20 > whether that be a new CD or a new tree, whatever). By making them additional, and non-mandatory. Providing the newer ebuilds as ~arch or as an overlay would both accomplish this, though like many others, I think using an overlay is a bad idea for this. --=20 Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering QA Manager/Games Developer Gentoo Linux Is your power animal a penguin? --=-00FePgcoZlH5/0sihXfU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBBGOO8kT4lNIS36YERAukhAJ9pThtHUuKIdohRs5kMZ+kGwX3TzgCggH6x j1kOi2Yzttw22z2qFeXVR6k= =Z5hJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-00FePgcoZlH5/0sihXfU--