From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21605 invoked from network); 28 Jul 2004 06:55:52 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 28 Jul 2004 06:55:52 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BpiLb-0000oF-6Y for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 06:55:37 +0000 Received: (qmail 2300 invoked by uid 89); 28 Jul 2004 06:55:30 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 12258 invoked from network); 28 Jul 2004 06:55:30 +0000 From: Tom Wesley To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20040728031117.GA21618@curie-int.orbis-terrarum.net> References: <200407271254.50020.absinthe@gentoo.org> <1090983187.7465.2.camel@zen.inferno> <20040728031117.GA21618@curie-int.orbis-terrarum.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-SFYniAevYeCFMlLMq12b" Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 07:55:36 +0100 Message-Id: <1090997736.11795.16.camel@tom.tomaw.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 1.5.9.2 X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de auth:e0c4ec921101b4afa5f9efb3db39afe3 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Bug voting X-Archives-Salt: 92347b5a-8e7a-4c57-929b-56970f5c6833 X-Archives-Hash: 6b44b59fda90bf8d4324137dc0929c47 --=-SFYniAevYeCFMlLMq12b Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2004-07-27 at 20:11 -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 10:53:07AM +0800, Mike Gardiner wrote: > > Hi Dylan, Ciaran, all > >=20 > > Apologies for entering this late, but from what I gather from the > > discussion, there seems to be the notion of voting for "real" bugs > > versus "enhancement" bugs, with some believing votes for the second > > would outweigh the first, and skew the perception of what really needs > > to be done. > >=20 > > So I guess my question follows, is it possible/feasible to only allow > > voting on bugs marked as "enhancements"? (as in the bugzilla keyword). > I don't think this would do any good. Users tend to mark bugs as > enhancement on a whim, from what I've seen. I'd say we should enable > voting for all bugs, and users should be informed that all enhancements > are considered separately from problems (your "real" bugs), and it > should be possible to show the highest voted problems as such.=20 >=20 > I'm also strongly in favour of a limited number of votes per user. Along > the lines of 2 votes/week for non-developers, and 4 votes/week for > developers. Unused votes should NOT get carried over between weeks, to > prevent vote hoarding. >=20 In case you're not aware how the KDE project maintain this, each user (not sure about special cases for developers, and not sure I agree with there being one.) has 100 voting points that they can allocated to bugs, withs a maximum of 20 on any one bug. --=20 Tom Wesley --=-SFYniAevYeCFMlLMq12b Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBBB03o0SQtKmb1pwMRArpMAJ98/bbFTiZAsR3Tfx4bWkQEBITa9QCfZik5 iz0PeF6s5yN27obsTmplx/U= =BZyf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-SFYniAevYeCFMlLMq12b--