From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <gentoo-dev-return-14389-arch-gentoo-dev=gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org> Received: (qmail 15509 invoked from network); 23 Jul 2004 14:42:10 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 23 Jul 2004 14:42:10 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Bo1FQ-0008C2-M6 for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 14:42:08 +0000 Received: (qmail 26094 invoked by uid 89); 23 Jul 2004 14:42:08 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-unsubscribe@gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-subscribe@gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 10169 invoked from network); 23 Jul 2004 14:42:08 +0000 From: Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@gentoo.org> Reply-To: wolf31o2@gentoo.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <200407231618.26529.carlo@gentoo.org> References: <20040720131405.GW18023@mail.lieber.org> <200407221235.03131.carlo@gentoo.org> <1090501615.22438.62.camel@localhost> <200407231618.26529.carlo@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-2mBmBHeKqLakNdDQN3dO" Organization: Gentoo Linux Message-Id: <1090593947.26203.14.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 10:45:47 -0400 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Revisiting GLEP 19 X-Archives-Salt: 3e7c8086-9ce9-46aa-bcae-53aa5232e440 X-Archives-Hash: 8e56048519c3db0048784600100e73fd --=-2mBmBHeKqLakNdDQN3dO Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2004-07-23 at 10:18, Carsten Lohrke wrote: > > echangelog <text> <bug> <foo> <bar> >=20 > These are fields, separated by spaces, too. What about when I type (take = in=20 > account my second nick name is typo): >=20 > echangelog had to touch this <beeep> ebuild the 4 th time because of=20 > continuing problems with bug 0815 and 4711 - thanks to joe helpful et al >=20 > How does echangelog know which of these numbers refer to bug reports? Actually, it would throw an error to begin with since you're not using the desired input format. You would need to input something like: echangelog "had to touch this <beeep> ebuild the 4 th time because of continuing problems with bug 0815 and 4711" "815 4711" "joe helpful" It would take the bugs from the "bugs" field. It shouldn't parse the text field at all. That's the whole point that I think everyone is trying to make with xml'izing the ChangeLog. Instead, you would do something more like this: echangelog "Modified src_unpack to add the fix-bug-0815.patch and also the fix-bug-4711.patch to the ebuild" "815 4711" "Joe Helpful, Johnny Patchmaker, Bob User" ...and of course, anything but the first field is optional, so for most changes, nothing would change as far as the developer is concerned. The whole point is to *allow* for better data handling, not to force more work on every developer. --=20 Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering QA Manager/Games Developer Gentoo Linux Is your power animal a penguin? --=-2mBmBHeKqLakNdDQN3dO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBBASSbkT4lNIS36YERAuJsAJ9YfW1W1mD3gFc5NjOPcw74DYGBGgCdGvyd 7GBAStNrfJkX4NND+5z0z2I= =7ilq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-2mBmBHeKqLakNdDQN3dO--