From: Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] KDE 3.2.3
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2004 15:04:36 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1089399875.11813.144.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200407091956.20813.arutha@gmx.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4763 bytes --]
On Fri, 2004-07-09 at 13:56, Alexander Gretencord wrote:
> Well someone on the kde team should, right? Or if you rely on user input,
> automatically push new versions from ~x86 to x86 when no user has complained
> (it's easier to complain than to state "everything works fine", especially
> when you don't use all of kde, I personally would never find a problem with
> kdegames as I don't install it). But I do use kdepim and if I find a problem
> with it I report it to the KDE bug system. However, I have not found any
> error that was the ebuilds fault. Should I file a bug stating "kdepim merged
> fine and seems to work ok a week after merging"?
A week is fine... a month is better.
> > The fact is that, with the way portage is structured and the commands you
> > have to use to properly make the submittals, it takes me well over an hour
> > to bump a version for KDE.
>
> For getting it from ~x86 to x86? If that's really the case then perhaps this
> should open a wider discussion: a) Need more developers as most do have a
> real life besides gentoo or b) make it simpler!
Considering KDE has many dependencies, *and* many things that depend on
it, I don't see how it could be made any simpler. More developers are
definitely needed, not only on the KDE team, but on most of them.
> > Considering the fact that it's volunteer time on my part, it gets put down
> > on my priority list.
>
> Then its the job of someone who does get paid to make it easier for the
> volunteers to get the job done, right?
Nobody at Gentoo gets paid to work for Gentoo.
> > So, if you want to be part of the solution, start being proactive in
> > helping to fix bugs and get ebuilds submitted.
>
> The ebuild is almost always there when I want to upgrade a package it just
> sits in ~x86 ...
package.unmask and package.keywords are your friends. Learn them! Use
them! Love them!
> > and it gets to be a bit frustrating to have to try and explain over and over
> > again.
>
> Have a standard reply to paste, also stating you just don't have the time to
> answer everyone personally. Its still better than saying nothing because
> you're overworked. In the time you explain this to all of those people you
> could move lots of packages to x86 :)
I'm sure he isn't wasting that much time replying... ;]
This tends to come up about every 3 months or so. Perhaps we should
just all bookmark this thread on gmane and next time it comes up, simply
paste them the URL and end the discussion right there.
> > That said, there's absolutely no harm in kde sitting as ~x86 for 3.2.3.
> > It's still completely installable, and portage is configurable enough so as
> > to not complain to you to downgrade.
>
> Yes there is harm in it. When I first see a package in ~x86 after the official
> release I think there might be a problem with it and don't merge it until I
> can't stand it any more and just merge it as I want to have a fix for all the
> bugs I reported for the last version of kde :)
>
> Still, if I just edit the various files in /etc/portage/ I might at some time
> get a really unusable version of an ebuild which would not be the case if the
> build sat in ~x86 for a week or so before going to x86.
No ebuild should ever move to stable after a week. The "Gentoo
standard" is 30 days.
> I really thought that an ebuild automatically went to x86 after some time of
> no complaints, until now...
Definitely not. What system would possibly be able to know if there
were complaints? Would we have it parse bugzilla? #gentoo? gentoo-user?
How about the forums?
> All that being said, I do understand that you all have a real life, work and
> family to attend to. Maybe gentoo should get more developers and skip ~x86
> until they have :) I would really like to help besides reporting a bug or two
> once in a while, if it wasn't so much work. What good would I do when all I
> could spend was and hour or two every few days. Or a whole day once in a
> while and then nothing for a week?
Honestly, if you think ~x86 should be skipped, then perhaps you should
be running it, instead. After all, you seem more than willing to help
with "testing" which is exactly what the ~arch KEYWORDS are all about.
We don't put things that we know are broken into the tree. Not as
~arch, and not as stable.
Funny enough, your "free time" to help out is about the same as most
Gentoo developers. Remember that absolutely *none* of us is paid and we
all have jobs/school/families to attend to other than Gentoo.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering QA Manager/Games Developer
Gentoo Linux
Is your power animal a penguin?
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-09 18:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 92+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-09 16:06 [gentoo-dev] KDE 3.2.3 Jeff Smelser
2004-07-09 16:09 ` Caleb Tennis
2004-07-09 16:16 ` Jeff Smelser
2004-07-09 16:33 ` Chris Gianelloni
2004-07-09 16:28 ` Chris Gianelloni
2004-07-09 16:40 ` Jeff Smelser
2004-07-09 16:44 ` Jeff Smelser
2004-07-09 16:52 ` Corey Shields
2004-07-09 17:10 ` Jeff Smelser
2004-07-09 18:29 ` Chris Gianelloni
[not found] ` <200407091134.36056.tradergt@smelser.org>
2004-07-09 18:16 ` Chris Gianelloni
2004-07-09 18:40 ` Jeff Smelser
2004-07-09 19:33 ` Chris Gianelloni
2004-07-10 4:04 ` Jeff Smelser
2004-07-10 4:26 ` Bryan D. Stine
2004-07-10 8:15 ` Robin H. Johnson
2004-07-09 20:37 ` George Shapovalov
2004-07-10 3:56 ` Jeff Smelser
2004-07-10 1:05 ` Chris W
2004-07-10 3:55 ` Jeff Smelser
2004-07-10 7:00 ` Chris W
2004-07-10 7:36 ` Jeff Smelser
2004-07-10 10:46 ` Alexander Gretencord
2004-07-10 19:21 ` marduk
2004-07-09 16:47 ` Corey Shields
2004-07-09 17:03 ` Jeff Smelser
2004-07-09 17:17 ` Caleb Tennis
2004-07-09 17:35 ` Jeff Smelser
2004-07-09 17:41 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-07-09 17:54 ` Jeff Smelser
2004-07-09 18:00 ` Peter Johanson
2004-07-09 18:03 ` Jeff Smelser
2004-07-09 19:30 ` Terje Kvernes
2004-07-09 18:51 ` Chris Gianelloni
2004-07-09 17:45 ` Stephen Becker
2004-07-09 18:02 ` Jeff Smelser
2004-07-09 18:17 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-07-09 18:41 ` Jeff Smelser
2004-07-09 18:47 ` Stephen P. Becker
2004-07-09 19:13 ` Mike Frysinger
2004-07-10 4:17 ` Jeff Smelser
2004-07-10 10:53 ` Alexander Gretencord
2004-07-10 14:41 ` Jeff Smelser
2004-07-10 15:10 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-07-10 15:57 ` Chris Gianelloni
2004-07-10 16:14 ` Carsten Lohrke
2004-07-10 21:33 ` Donnie Berkholz
2004-07-10 22:31 ` Carsten Lohrke
2004-07-10 16:19 ` Jeff Smelser
2004-07-10 16:21 ` Stuart Herbert
2004-07-10 17:01 ` Jeff Smelser
2004-07-10 17:08 ` [gentoo-dev] How can I help? Stuart Herbert
2004-07-10 17:11 ` [gentoo-dev] KDE 3.2.3 Jon Portnoy
2004-07-10 17:08 ` Jon Portnoy
2004-07-10 17:19 ` Jeff Smelser
2004-07-10 18:18 ` Chris Gianelloni
2004-07-11 15:25 ` Jeff Smelser
2004-07-11 18:16 ` Dylan Carlson
2004-07-11 21:38 ` [gentoo-dev] [OT] " Joseph Booker
2004-07-11 23:37 ` Dylan Carlson
2004-07-12 0:18 ` Joseph Booker
2004-07-12 1:47 ` Jeff Smelser
2004-07-12 2:09 ` marduk
2004-07-12 2:20 ` Jeff Smelser
2004-07-12 2:47 ` Seemant Kulleen
2004-07-12 3:36 ` Dave
2004-07-12 3:01 ` marduk
2004-08-04 11:18 ` Paul de Vrieze
2004-08-04 16:35 ` Jeff Smelser
2004-07-10 21:45 ` [gentoo-dev] " Dylan Carlson
2004-07-10 21:53 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-07-11 12:30 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: [OT] " Spider
2004-07-09 19:20 ` [gentoo-dev] " Chris Gianelloni
[not found] ` <20040709193814.GB13018@obelix.int.coil.demon.nl>
2004-07-09 20:15 ` Chris Gianelloni
2004-07-09 17:56 ` Alexander Gretencord
2004-07-09 18:21 ` Caleb Tennis
2004-07-09 18:42 ` Alexander Gretencord
2004-07-09 19:16 ` Mike Frysinger
2004-07-09 19:04 ` Chris Gianelloni [this message]
2004-07-09 19:39 ` Alexander Gretencord
2004-07-09 17:31 ` FRLinux
2004-07-09 17:39 ` Jeff Smelser
2004-07-09 19:33 ` Phil Richards
2004-07-09 18:37 ` Kurt Lieber
2004-07-10 3:36 ` [gentoo-dev] Ways for non devs to contribute (was KDE 3.2.3) Andrew Cowie
2004-07-10 4:03 ` Marius Mauch
2004-07-10 4:14 ` Jason Stubbs
2004-07-10 12:49 ` Kurt Lieber
2004-07-10 4:09 ` [gentoo-dev] KDE 3.2.3 Jeff Smelser
2004-07-10 11:42 ` Carsten Lohrke
2004-07-10 16:06 ` Jason Stubbs
2004-07-10 16:52 ` Jeff Smelser
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1089399875.11813.144.camel@localhost \
--to=wolf31o2@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox