public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] KDE 3.2.3
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2004 15:04:36 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1089399875.11813.144.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200407091956.20813.arutha@gmx.de>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4763 bytes --]

On Fri, 2004-07-09 at 13:56, Alexander Gretencord wrote:
> Well someone on the kde team should, right? Or if you rely on user input, 
> automatically push new versions from ~x86 to x86 when no user has complained 
> (it's easier to complain than to state "everything works fine", especially 
> when you don't use all of kde, I personally would never find a problem with 
> kdegames as I don't install it). But I do use kdepim and if I find a problem 
> with it I report it to the KDE bug system. However, I have not found any 
> error that was the ebuilds fault. Should I file a bug stating "kdepim merged 
> fine and seems to work ok a week after merging"?

A week is fine... a month is better.

> > The fact is that, with the way portage is structured and the commands you
> > have to use to properly make the submittals, it takes me well over an hour
> > to bump a version for KDE.  
> 
> For getting it from ~x86 to x86? If that's really the case then perhaps this 
> should open a wider discussion: a) Need more developers as most do have a 
> real life besides gentoo or b) make it simpler!

Considering KDE has many dependencies, *and* many things that depend on
it, I don't see how it could be made any simpler.  More developers are
definitely needed, not only on the KDE team, but on most of them.

> > Considering the fact that it's volunteer time on my part, it gets put down
> > on my priority list.
> 
> Then its the job of someone who does get paid to make it easier for the 
> volunteers to get the job done, right?

Nobody at Gentoo gets paid to work for Gentoo.

> > So, if you want to be part of the solution, start being proactive in
> > helping to fix bugs and get ebuilds submitted.
> 
> The ebuild is almost always there when I want to upgrade a package it just 
> sits in ~x86 ...

package.unmask and package.keywords are your friends.  Learn them!  Use
them!  Love them!

> > and it gets to be a bit frustrating to have to try and explain over and over
> > again. 
> 
> Have a standard reply to paste, also stating you just don't have the time to 
> answer everyone personally. Its still better than saying nothing because 
> you're overworked. In the time you explain this to all of those people you 
> could move lots of packages to x86 :)

I'm sure he isn't wasting that much time replying... ;]

This tends to come up about every 3 months or so.  Perhaps we should
just all bookmark this thread on gmane and next time it comes up, simply
paste them the URL and end the discussion right there.

> > That said, there's absolutely no harm in kde sitting as ~x86 for 3.2.3. 
> > It's still completely installable, and portage is configurable enough so as
> > to not complain to you to downgrade.
> 
> Yes there is harm in it. When I first see a package in ~x86 after the official 
> release I think there might be a problem with it and don't merge it until I 
> can't stand it any more and just merge it as I want to have a fix for all the 
> bugs I reported for the last version of kde :)
> 
> Still, if I just edit the various files in /etc/portage/ I might at some time 
> get a really unusable version of an ebuild which would not be the case if the 
> build sat in ~x86 for a week or so before going to x86.

No ebuild should ever move to stable after a week.  The "Gentoo
standard" is 30 days.

> I really thought that an ebuild automatically went to x86 after some time of 
> no complaints, until now...

Definitely not.  What system would possibly be able to know if there
were complaints?  Would we have it parse bugzilla? #gentoo? gentoo-user?

How about the forums?

> All that being said, I do understand that you all have a real life, work and 
> family to attend to. Maybe gentoo should get more developers and skip ~x86 
> until they have :) I would really like to help besides reporting a bug or two 
> once in a while, if it wasn't so much work. What good would I do when all I 
> could spend was and hour or two every few days. Or a whole day once in a 
> while and then nothing for a week?

Honestly, if you think ~x86 should be skipped, then perhaps you should
be running it, instead.  After all, you seem more than willing to help
with "testing" which is exactly what the ~arch KEYWORDS are all about. 
We don't put things that we know are broken into the tree.  Not as
~arch, and not as stable.

Funny enough, your "free time" to help out is about the same as most
Gentoo developers.  Remember that absolutely *none* of us is paid and we
all have jobs/school/families to attend to other than Gentoo.

-- 
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering QA Manager/Games Developer
Gentoo Linux

Is your power animal a penguin?

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-07-09 18:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 92+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-07-09 16:06 [gentoo-dev] KDE 3.2.3 Jeff Smelser
2004-07-09 16:09 ` Caleb Tennis
2004-07-09 16:16   ` Jeff Smelser
2004-07-09 16:33     ` Chris Gianelloni
2004-07-09 16:28 ` Chris Gianelloni
2004-07-09 16:40   ` Jeff Smelser
2004-07-09 16:44     ` Jeff Smelser
2004-07-09 16:52       ` Corey Shields
2004-07-09 17:10         ` Jeff Smelser
2004-07-09 18:29           ` Chris Gianelloni
     [not found]   ` <200407091134.36056.tradergt@smelser.org>
2004-07-09 18:16     ` Chris Gianelloni
2004-07-09 18:40       ` Jeff Smelser
2004-07-09 19:33         ` Chris Gianelloni
2004-07-10  4:04           ` Jeff Smelser
2004-07-10  4:26             ` Bryan D. Stine
2004-07-10  8:15               ` Robin H. Johnson
2004-07-09 20:37         ` George Shapovalov
2004-07-10  3:56           ` Jeff Smelser
2004-07-10  1:05         ` Chris W
2004-07-10  3:55           ` Jeff Smelser
2004-07-10  7:00             ` Chris W
2004-07-10  7:36               ` Jeff Smelser
2004-07-10 10:46                 ` Alexander Gretencord
2004-07-10 19:21           ` marduk
2004-07-09 16:47 ` Corey Shields
2004-07-09 17:03   ` Jeff Smelser
2004-07-09 17:17     ` Caleb Tennis
2004-07-09 17:35       ` Jeff Smelser
2004-07-09 17:41         ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-07-09 17:54           ` Jeff Smelser
2004-07-09 18:00             ` Peter Johanson
2004-07-09 18:03               ` Jeff Smelser
2004-07-09 19:30                 ` Terje Kvernes
2004-07-09 18:51             ` Chris Gianelloni
2004-07-09 17:45         ` Stephen Becker
2004-07-09 18:02           ` Jeff Smelser
2004-07-09 18:17             ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-07-09 18:41               ` Jeff Smelser
2004-07-09 18:47                 ` Stephen P. Becker
2004-07-09 19:13                   ` Mike Frysinger
2004-07-10  4:17                   ` Jeff Smelser
2004-07-10 10:53                     ` Alexander Gretencord
2004-07-10 14:41                       ` Jeff Smelser
2004-07-10 15:10                         ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-07-10 15:57                         ` Chris Gianelloni
2004-07-10 16:14                           ` Carsten Lohrke
2004-07-10 21:33                             ` Donnie Berkholz
2004-07-10 22:31                               ` Carsten Lohrke
2004-07-10 16:19                           ` Jeff Smelser
2004-07-10 16:21                         ` Stuart Herbert
2004-07-10 17:01                           ` Jeff Smelser
2004-07-10 17:08                             ` [gentoo-dev] How can I help? Stuart Herbert
2004-07-10 17:11                           ` [gentoo-dev] KDE 3.2.3 Jon Portnoy
2004-07-10 17:08                         ` Jon Portnoy
2004-07-10 17:19                           ` Jeff Smelser
2004-07-10 18:18                             ` Chris Gianelloni
2004-07-11 15:25                               ` Jeff Smelser
2004-07-11 18:16                               ` Dylan Carlson
2004-07-11 21:38                                 ` [gentoo-dev] [OT] " Joseph Booker
2004-07-11 23:37                                   ` Dylan Carlson
2004-07-12  0:18                                     ` Joseph Booker
2004-07-12  1:47                                   ` Jeff Smelser
2004-07-12  2:09                                     ` marduk
2004-07-12  2:20                                       ` Jeff Smelser
2004-07-12  2:47                                         ` Seemant Kulleen
2004-07-12  3:36                                       ` Dave
2004-07-12  3:01                                         ` marduk
2004-08-04 11:18                                     ` Paul de Vrieze
2004-08-04 16:35                                       ` Jeff Smelser
2004-07-10 21:45                           ` [gentoo-dev] " Dylan Carlson
2004-07-10 21:53                             ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-07-11 12:30                               ` [gentoo-dev] Re: [OT] " Spider
2004-07-09 19:20                 ` [gentoo-dev] " Chris Gianelloni
     [not found]                   ` <20040709193814.GB13018@obelix.int.coil.demon.nl>
2004-07-09 20:15                     ` Chris Gianelloni
2004-07-09 17:56       ` Alexander Gretencord
2004-07-09 18:21         ` Caleb Tennis
2004-07-09 18:42           ` Alexander Gretencord
2004-07-09 19:16           ` Mike Frysinger
2004-07-09 19:04         ` Chris Gianelloni [this message]
2004-07-09 19:39           ` Alexander Gretencord
2004-07-09 17:31     ` FRLinux
2004-07-09 17:39       ` Jeff Smelser
2004-07-09 19:33       ` Phil Richards
2004-07-09 18:37 ` Kurt Lieber
2004-07-10  3:36   ` [gentoo-dev] Ways for non devs to contribute (was KDE 3.2.3) Andrew Cowie
2004-07-10  4:03     ` Marius Mauch
2004-07-10  4:14     ` Jason Stubbs
2004-07-10 12:49     ` Kurt Lieber
2004-07-10  4:09   ` [gentoo-dev] KDE 3.2.3 Jeff Smelser
2004-07-10 11:42     ` Carsten Lohrke
2004-07-10 16:06 ` Jason Stubbs
2004-07-10 16:52   ` Jeff Smelser

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1089399875.11813.144.camel@localhost \
    --to=wolf31o2@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox