From: John Davis <zhen@gentoo.org>
To: wolf31o2@gentoo.org
Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] x86 2004.2 Profile
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2004 13:15:50 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1089393350.32612.63.camel@woot.uberdavis.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1089389500.11041.64.camel@localhost>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1290 bytes --]
On Fri, 2004-07-09 at 12:11, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> The idea of changing a virtual mid-release has *always* bothered me and
> is a prime example of Gentoo's problems when it comes to enterprise
> users. In an enterprise environment, consistency between releases is
> expected. I should *never* have to wonder which X server got installed
> between on each machine between multiple 2004.2 installations. I should
> *know* that 2004.0 and 2004.1 used XFree86 and that 2004.2+ uses X.org's
> server.
But at this point in time, Gentoo is *not* an Enterprise system.
Packages have zero consistency between releases (even between weeks).
Creating a whole new profile and then going through the hoops
(documentation and user support) to get them all to switch over to the
new profile far outweighs the benefit .. especially for (basically) one
package!
The problem of consistency is far beyond the xfree/ xorg switch. Why put
all of the effort into one package when we don't have more important
things, like our toolchain, stabilized between releases?
Cheers,
--
John Davis
Gentoo Linux Developer
<http://dev.gentoo.org/~zhen>
----
GnuPG Public Key: <http://dev.gentoo.org/~zhen/zhen_pub.asc>
Fingerprint: 4F9E 41F6 D072 5C1A 636C 2D46 B92C 4823 E281 41BB
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-09 17:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1089375713.8755.5.camel@antares.hausnetz>
[not found] ` <1089380082.32612.3.camel@woot.uberdavis.com>
2004-07-09 14:42 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] x86 2004.2 Profile Chris Gianelloni
2004-07-09 15:37 ` Grant Goodyear
2004-07-09 16:11 ` [gentoo-dev] " Chris Gianelloni
2004-07-09 17:15 ` John Davis [this message]
2004-07-09 18:12 ` Dylan Carlson
2004-07-09 18:28 ` Chris Gianelloni
2004-07-09 20:00 ` Andrew Gaffney
2004-07-09 20:37 ` Sami Samhuri
2004-07-09 21:07 ` Donnie Berkholz
2004-07-09 23:16 ` Spider
2004-07-10 18:23 ` Chris Gianelloni
2004-07-10 19:23 ` Spider
2004-07-10 19:48 ` George Shapovalov
2004-07-10 21:36 ` Dylan Carlson
2004-07-12 1:30 ` John Davis
2004-08-04 10:52 ` Paul de Vrieze
2004-07-09 13:51 Benjamin Judas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1089393350.32612.63.camel@woot.uberdavis.com \
--to=zhen@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
--cc=wolf31o2@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox