From: foser <foser@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] summary: proposed solutions to arches/stable problem
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 13:31:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1087990299.9412.2.camel@rivendell> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200406222006.39054.jhuebel@gentoo.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 260 bytes --]
This is solution I & it is really duplication of information, because if
the arch maintainer thinks something can go stable, it's not more than
logical he will make it stable. So you only have to indicate which arch
(es) is/are the maintainers.
- foser
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-06-23 11:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 102+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20040619201130.09c1e2b9@localhost>
[not found] ` <20040619211705.57a479f0@snowdrop.home>
2004-06-19 20:48 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] From [gentoo-dev] Arches marking ebuilds stable before maintainer foser
2004-06-19 21:11 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-06-19 21:32 ` foser
2004-06-19 23:33 ` Jason Wever
2004-06-19 23:59 ` foser
2004-06-20 0:17 ` Jason Wever
2004-06-20 14:36 ` foser
2004-06-19 18:05 ` Jon Hood
2004-06-20 19:31 ` Guy Martin
2004-06-20 19:33 ` Jon Hood
2004-06-22 0:21 ` foser
2004-06-22 8:13 ` Guy Martin
2004-06-22 7:03 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: that script (was [gentoo-dev] Arches marking ebuilds stable before maintainer) Travis Tilley
2004-06-22 11:45 ` Karl Trygve Kalleberg
2004-06-22 11:41 ` [gentoo-dev] Arches marking ebuilds stable before maintainer Carsten Lohrke
2004-06-22 14:44 ` [gentoo-dev] proposed solution to arches/stable problem Aron Griffis
2004-06-22 13:05 ` Travis Tilley
2004-06-22 17:53 ` Aron Griffis
2004-06-22 15:38 ` foser
2004-06-22 16:17 ` Carsten Lohrke
2004-06-22 16:25 ` Aron Griffis
2004-06-22 16:47 ` Carsten Lohrke
2004-06-22 17:33 ` Aron Griffis
2004-06-22 17:54 ` Aron Griffis
2004-06-22 18:31 ` Carsten Lohrke
2004-06-22 19:49 ` Aron Griffis
2004-06-22 20:20 ` Jason Huebel
2004-06-22 20:54 ` Aron Griffis
2004-06-23 0:54 ` Jason Huebel
2004-06-22 22:07 ` Carsten Lohrke
2004-06-23 0:04 ` Marius Mauch
2004-06-23 14:47 ` Carsten Lohrke
2004-06-22 16:20 ` Aron Griffis
2004-06-22 15:59 ` Ferris McCormick
2004-06-22 17:36 ` Aron Griffis
2004-06-22 17:52 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-06-22 18:12 ` Aron Griffis
2004-06-22 18:43 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-06-22 19:44 ` Aron Griffis
2004-06-22 21:42 ` foser
2004-06-22 18:13 ` Ferris McCormick
2004-06-22 22:19 ` Carsten Lohrke
2004-06-22 18:08 ` Ferris McCormick
2004-06-22 19:52 ` Aron Griffis
2004-06-22 16:10 ` Chris Gianelloni
2004-06-22 16:22 ` Aron Griffis
2004-06-22 21:33 ` [gentoo-dev] summary: proposed solutions " Aron Griffis
2004-06-22 21:54 ` Donnie Berkholz
2004-06-22 23:09 ` Carsten Lohrke
2004-06-23 0:15 ` Marius Mauch
2004-06-23 15:03 ` Carsten Lohrke
2004-06-24 4:08 ` Aron Griffis
2004-06-23 1:07 ` Jason Huebel
2004-06-23 11:34 ` foser
2004-06-23 15:08 ` Ferris McCormick
2004-06-23 18:39 ` foser
2004-06-23 19:01 ` Ferris McCormick
2004-06-23 21:05 ` Carsten Lohrke
2004-06-23 21:55 ` foser
2004-06-23 22:29 ` Ferris McCormick
2004-06-23 19:09 ` Donnie Berkholz
2004-06-23 19:57 ` Jason Huebel
2004-06-23 20:31 ` Chris Gianelloni
2004-06-23 21:13 ` Donnie Berkholz
2004-06-23 21:35 ` Jason Huebel
2004-06-24 4:15 ` Aron Griffis
2004-06-24 4:14 ` Aron Griffis
2004-06-23 17:58 ` Jason Huebel
2004-06-23 18:45 ` foser
2004-06-24 4:16 ` Aron Griffis
2004-06-24 8:28 ` Alexander Futasz
2004-06-23 18:59 ` Chris Gianelloni
2004-06-24 4:00 ` Aron Griffis
2004-06-23 1:12 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-06-23 1:22 ` Jason Huebel
2004-06-22 22:25 ` Ferris McCormick
2004-06-24 4:21 ` Aron Griffis
2004-06-22 22:28 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-06-24 4:50 ` Aron Griffis
2004-06-23 1:06 ` Jason Huebel
2004-06-23 11:31 ` foser [this message]
2004-06-23 15:38 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-06-23 16:08 ` Chris Gianelloni
2004-06-23 19:04 ` Donnie Berkholz
2004-06-23 19:19 ` Chris Gianelloni
2004-06-24 4:54 ` Aron Griffis
2004-06-24 12:30 ` Chris Gianelloni
2004-06-24 4:51 ` Aron Griffis
2004-06-24 11:48 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2004-06-24 16:51 ` Jason Huebel
2004-06-24 19:22 ` Aron Griffis
2004-06-23 10:53 ` [gentoo-dev] " Paul de Vrieze
2004-06-23 13:37 ` Jason Stubbs
2004-06-23 15:07 ` foser
2004-06-23 23:08 ` Jason Stubbs
2004-06-23 23:16 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-06-23 15:28 ` Carsten Lohrke
2004-06-24 4:55 ` Aron Griffis
2004-06-24 16:22 ` Jason Stubbs
2004-06-21 4:21 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] From [gentoo-dev] Arches marking ebuilds stable before maintainer Jason Wever
2004-06-20 23:36 ` Travis Tilley
2004-06-22 13:22 ` foser
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1087990299.9412.2.camel@rivendell \
--to=foser@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox