From: Jon Hood <squinky86@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Arches marking ebuilds stable before maintainer
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2004 13:05:34 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1087668334.6742.7.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1087742168.15741.5.camel@rivendell>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 944 bytes --]
On Sun, 2004-06-20 at 09:36, foser wrote:
> > > You skip things around. It is not the 'maintainers arch' that is QA-ing
> > > for an arch it does not maintain, it's the 'arch maintainer' thats skips
> > > part of QA done by the 'package maintainer'.
> >
> > Examples?
net-p2p/mldonkey- I refuse to mark >2.5.16 stable because of numerous
bug reports and stability problems with the newer versions (though the
latest version in portage does seem a bit more stable). Completely
ignoring this, those versions are on the "stable on hppa". It's not a
majorly critical package, but it is an example of the QA done by the
maintainer, and the arch maintainer going beyond it. I don't mind much,
because I have yet to get a bug report from an hppa user, but I would
have prefered to keep it all testing until for at least another month.
-Jon
--
AIM: Squinky01
Yahoo!: Squinky86
ICQ: 160940989
Jabber: squinky86@im.gentoo.org
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-06-20 18:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 127+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20040619201130.09c1e2b9@localhost>
[not found] ` <20040619211705.57a479f0@snowdrop.home>
2004-06-19 20:48 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] From [gentoo-dev] Arches marking ebuilds stable before maintainer foser
2004-06-19 21:11 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-06-19 21:32 ` foser
2004-06-19 23:33 ` Jason Wever
2004-06-19 23:59 ` foser
2004-06-20 0:17 ` Jason Wever
2004-06-20 14:36 ` foser
2004-06-19 18:05 ` Jon Hood [this message]
2004-06-20 19:31 ` Guy Martin
2004-06-20 19:33 ` Jon Hood
2004-06-22 0:21 ` foser
2004-06-22 8:13 ` Guy Martin
2004-06-22 7:03 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: that script (was [gentoo-dev] Arches marking ebuilds stable before maintainer) Travis Tilley
2004-06-22 11:45 ` Karl Trygve Kalleberg
2004-06-22 11:41 ` [gentoo-dev] Arches marking ebuilds stable before maintainer Carsten Lohrke
2004-06-22 14:44 ` [gentoo-dev] proposed solution to arches/stable problem Aron Griffis
2004-06-22 13:05 ` Travis Tilley
2004-06-22 17:53 ` Aron Griffis
2004-06-22 15:38 ` foser
2004-06-22 16:17 ` Carsten Lohrke
2004-06-22 16:25 ` Aron Griffis
2004-06-22 16:47 ` Carsten Lohrke
2004-06-22 17:33 ` Aron Griffis
2004-06-22 17:54 ` Aron Griffis
2004-06-22 18:31 ` Carsten Lohrke
2004-06-22 19:49 ` Aron Griffis
2004-06-22 20:20 ` Jason Huebel
2004-06-22 20:54 ` Aron Griffis
2004-06-23 0:54 ` Jason Huebel
2004-06-22 22:07 ` Carsten Lohrke
2004-06-23 0:04 ` Marius Mauch
2004-06-23 14:47 ` Carsten Lohrke
2004-06-22 16:20 ` Aron Griffis
2004-06-22 15:59 ` Ferris McCormick
2004-06-22 17:36 ` Aron Griffis
2004-06-22 17:52 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-06-22 18:12 ` Aron Griffis
2004-06-22 18:43 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-06-22 19:44 ` Aron Griffis
2004-06-22 21:42 ` foser
2004-06-22 18:13 ` Ferris McCormick
2004-06-22 22:19 ` Carsten Lohrke
2004-06-22 18:08 ` Ferris McCormick
2004-06-22 19:52 ` Aron Griffis
2004-06-22 16:10 ` Chris Gianelloni
2004-06-22 16:22 ` Aron Griffis
2004-06-22 21:33 ` [gentoo-dev] summary: proposed solutions " Aron Griffis
2004-06-22 21:54 ` Donnie Berkholz
2004-06-22 23:09 ` Carsten Lohrke
2004-06-23 0:15 ` Marius Mauch
2004-06-23 15:03 ` Carsten Lohrke
2004-06-24 4:08 ` Aron Griffis
2004-06-23 1:07 ` Jason Huebel
2004-06-23 11:34 ` foser
2004-06-23 15:08 ` Ferris McCormick
2004-06-23 18:39 ` foser
2004-06-23 19:01 ` Ferris McCormick
2004-06-23 21:05 ` Carsten Lohrke
2004-06-23 21:55 ` foser
2004-06-23 22:29 ` Ferris McCormick
2004-06-23 19:09 ` Donnie Berkholz
2004-06-23 19:57 ` Jason Huebel
2004-06-23 20:31 ` Chris Gianelloni
2004-06-23 21:13 ` Donnie Berkholz
2004-06-23 21:35 ` Jason Huebel
2004-06-24 4:15 ` Aron Griffis
2004-06-24 4:14 ` Aron Griffis
2004-06-23 17:58 ` Jason Huebel
2004-06-23 18:45 ` foser
2004-06-24 4:16 ` Aron Griffis
2004-06-24 8:28 ` Alexander Futasz
2004-06-23 18:59 ` Chris Gianelloni
2004-06-24 4:00 ` Aron Griffis
2004-06-23 1:12 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-06-23 1:22 ` Jason Huebel
2004-06-22 22:25 ` Ferris McCormick
2004-06-24 4:21 ` Aron Griffis
2004-06-22 22:28 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-06-24 4:50 ` Aron Griffis
2004-06-23 1:06 ` Jason Huebel
2004-06-23 11:31 ` foser
2004-06-23 15:38 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-06-23 16:08 ` Chris Gianelloni
2004-06-23 19:04 ` Donnie Berkholz
2004-06-23 19:19 ` Chris Gianelloni
2004-06-24 4:54 ` Aron Griffis
2004-06-24 12:30 ` Chris Gianelloni
2004-06-24 4:51 ` Aron Griffis
2004-06-24 11:48 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2004-06-24 16:51 ` Jason Huebel
2004-06-24 19:22 ` Aron Griffis
2004-06-23 10:53 ` [gentoo-dev] " Paul de Vrieze
2004-06-23 13:37 ` Jason Stubbs
2004-06-23 15:07 ` foser
2004-06-23 23:08 ` Jason Stubbs
2004-06-23 23:16 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-06-23 15:28 ` Carsten Lohrke
2004-06-24 4:55 ` Aron Griffis
2004-06-24 16:22 ` Jason Stubbs
2004-06-21 4:21 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] From [gentoo-dev] Arches marking ebuilds stable before maintainer Jason Wever
2004-06-20 23:36 ` Travis Tilley
2004-06-22 13:22 ` foser
2004-06-17 19:54 Jon Portnoy
2004-06-17 22:04 ` foser
2004-06-18 16:45 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-06-18 22:19 ` Paul de Vrieze
2004-06-18 21:08 ` Travis Tilley
2004-06-19 15:21 ` foser
2004-06-19 17:36 ` Stephen P. Becker
2004-06-19 20:46 ` Danny van Dyk
2004-06-19 21:34 ` Donnie Berkholz
2004-06-19 23:04 ` foser
2004-06-19 23:25 ` Donnie Berkholz
2004-06-20 22:55 ` Travis Tilley
2004-06-21 23:04 ` foser
2004-06-21 23:48 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-06-22 0:12 ` foser
2004-06-22 0:36 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-06-18 22:29 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-06-18 23:27 ` Carsten Lohrke
2004-06-19 0:29 ` Donnie Berkholz
2004-06-19 1:36 ` Carsten Lohrke
2004-06-19 0:33 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-06-19 0:57 ` Donnie Berkholz
2004-06-19 1:19 ` Carsten Lohrke
2004-06-18 22:27 ` Donnie Berkholz
2004-06-19 16:31 ` foser
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1087668334.6742.7.camel@localhost \
--to=squinky86@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox