From: Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@gentoo.org>
To: Christian Gut <cycloon@is-root.org>
Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Stuff that makes people mad
Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 14:55:39 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1085165739.25140.99.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040521181432.GD29108@is-root.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2080 bytes --]
On Fri, 2004-05-21 at 14:14, Christian Gut wrote:
> I to agree with both sides. But what about integrating an easy way to
> add custom rsync or perhaps ftp/http repositorys stackable to portage?
> like debian does it with apt. If there is a user maintaining ebuilds
> which can't get into the gentoo tree, he sets up his own tree and
> maintains them there. If others want that ebuilds, they add his tree to
> their .. make.conf.
An interesting idea, and one that has been proposed a dozen times
before. Look below for reasons why it is a bad idea.
> Yes I know about overlay but i think of a more flexible way... the sites
> like breakmygentoo could maintain repositories with untested ebuilds and
> users are on their own testing/using them but it would perhaps help to
> grow people writing better ebuilds and wanting to becume gentoo devs.
Guess what happens when something goes wrong? Do you know where the bug
report goes? I sure do. What if you use a BMG ebuild for GCC or glibc
and everything *seems* fine. Then you build python with it. Then you
even "upgrade" back to the "official" GCC/glibc. Guess what? Your
python is still compiled with the unofficial GCC and when you submit a
portage bug, it could very well be caused by the fact you were *at one
time* using an unofficial ebuild for GCC. Don't think it can happen?
Go look at bugzilla.
Once again, the general consensus from the people actually responsible
for maintaining Gentoo is that there's nothing wrong with "unofficial"
ebuilds of any kind, but *we* cannot be held responsible for what *you*
do to your system when running ebuilds *not* made/maintained by us.
Period.
There's absolutely nothing stopping you from coding up a "multiple tree"
version of portage and getting people to use it. However, in the sake
of sanity and QA, there is no way that we could sanction it officially
without taking the quality of Gentoo as a whole down the toilet.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Developer
Games/LiveCD Teams
Gentoo Linux
Is your power animal a penguin?
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-05-21 18:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-05-21 1:46 [gentoo-dev] Stuff that makes people mad C. Brewer
2004-05-21 4:08 ` Andrew Gaffney
2004-05-21 6:33 ` Robin H. Johnson
2004-05-21 13:19 ` John Nilsson
2004-05-21 13:39 ` Chris Gianelloni
2004-05-21 14:54 ` Chris Bainbridge
2004-05-21 15:04 ` Stephen Becker
2004-05-21 16:29 ` Josh Glover
2004-05-21 16:36 ` Jon Portnoy
2004-05-21 16:40 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-05-21 17:39 ` Josh Glover
2004-05-21 17:59 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-05-21 22:07 ` Mike Frysinger
2004-05-23 15:54 ` Karl Trygve Kalleberg
2004-05-23 17:13 ` Joseph Booker
2004-05-23 21:46 ` Karl Trygve Kalleberg
2004-05-21 18:14 ` Christian Gut
2004-05-21 18:36 ` Marius Mauch
2004-05-21 20:53 ` Joseph Booker
2004-05-21 18:55 ` Chris Gianelloni [this message]
2004-05-21 15:32 ` Jason Stubbs
2004-05-21 16:12 ` Chris Bainbridge
2004-05-21 16:33 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-05-21 16:42 ` Chris Bainbridge
2004-05-21 16:53 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-05-21 18:35 ` Chris Gianelloni
2004-05-21 17:40 ` Jason Stubbs
2004-05-21 15:39 ` Chris Gianelloni
2004-05-21 15:42 ` Jason Stubbs
2004-05-25 16:02 ` Jean Jordaan
2004-05-21 15:43 ` Tom Payne
2004-05-21 16:11 ` Allen Dale Parker
2004-05-21 16:19 ` Jon Portnoy
2004-05-21 19:49 ` Stuart Herbert
2004-05-21 16:59 ` John Nilsson
2004-05-21 17:14 ` Jon Portnoy
2004-05-21 17:16 ` Tom Payne
2004-05-21 17:25 ` Jason Stubbs
2004-05-21 21:59 ` John Nilsson
2004-05-21 22:06 ` Stuart Herbert
2004-05-21 22:34 ` John Nilsson
2004-05-21 22:43 ` Joseph Booker
2004-05-23 13:42 ` John Nilsson
2004-05-21 18:45 ` Chris Gianelloni
2004-05-21 22:28 ` John Nilsson
2004-05-21 22:40 ` Joseph Booker
2004-05-21 23:27 ` John Nilsson
2004-05-21 23:59 ` Joseph Booker
2004-05-22 3:29 ` John Nilsson
2004-05-22 13:02 ` Stuart Herbert
2004-05-23 14:05 ` John Nilsson
2004-05-23 14:45 ` Allen Dale Parker
2004-05-23 19:56 ` John Nilsson
2004-05-23 15:40 ` Joseph Booker
2004-05-23 21:17 ` John Nilsson
2004-05-23 23:12 ` Marius Mauch
2004-05-24 1:26 ` John Nilsson
2004-05-23 23:34 ` Joseph Booker
2004-05-24 4:11 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2004-05-24 4:59 ` John Nilsson
2004-05-24 8:21 ` Paul de Vrieze
2004-05-21 18:42 ` [gentoo-dev] " Stuart Herbert
2004-05-21 13:30 ` Chris Gianelloni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1085165739.25140.99.camel@localhost \
--to=wolf31o2@gentoo.org \
--cc=cycloon@is-root.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox